Prior to Vancouver, her layout included 7 triples, repeating the flip and toeloop, and two 2A, her combos including 3F-3T, 2A-3T.
Since 2011 she did watered down her content (I remember a season when her most difficult jump was 3Loop). However, by Sochi, she had the lutz and the flip back in her programs, but she never went back to a full 7 triples and two 2A if I recall correctly
Yes but she has never skated clean that program, always some mistakes here and there and often even disastrous performances.
Really, are the gap between them all that big? Does poor or no interpretation actually matter to the PCS overall? Can judges actually 'judge' the difference? The PCS are 10-15 points too high compare to the past. Quality is more than just consistent mediocrity but are they acknowledged correctly?
