I'm really happy with the judging in this event - it seems fair.TES:
1. Ilia
2. Junhwan
3. Shoma
PCS:
1. Jason
2. Shoma
3. Kevin
4. Junhwan (just 0.01 lower than Kevin's PCS)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm really happy with the judging in this event - it seems fair.TES:
1. Ilia
2. Junhwan
3. Shoma
PCS:
1. Jason
2. Shoma
3. Kevin
4. Junhwan (just 0.01 lower than Kevin's PCS)
No doubt. But I don't want it to go higher than those who really show their ice skills (excluding jumps) just because he's gotten more cleaner, but not better regarding his blade work. But we all know consistency automatically equals gradual increase in PCS, much to the incredulity of this sport. And to that I say, I will not be shocked, but will also add that I really hope Illia's skating skills will improve greatly by next Olympics, if not next season.One word. Consistency. If Ilia starts showing that kind of consistency and gets better programs it will rise also.
I think he is a lot more artistic, if that is the right word, than Ilia was at this competition. Ilia needs better music—something he can relate to more—and perhaps should lower his technical content (but probably won’t).Well good news is that Ilia walking out with a medal and the US men have kept their three spots. The bad news is that the bais against Ilia is starting to show itself a bit. Now Uno won his title fair and square but I have problem with Cha getting the silver mostly though PCS because to be honest he is not much more artistic than Ilia and n my opinion. But next year Ilia going to be back and if bais continues he will just start doing Quint's because he working on them now and the worlds next year will be in our backyard.
If Sasha's jumps were slightly cleaner, she would have won. It's not the PCS that matters, but the cleanness of the landings.But did she win the Olympics though? I don't think anyone is saying focusing on tech is not the way. But there certainly is no point crying when the person loses on the PCS when their PCS capability is not up to par.
But would she have won if she was better in PCS than Anna, with all the tech error she had? So how does the PCS not matter?If Sasha's jumps were slightly cleaner, she would have won. It's not the PCS that matters, but the cleanness of the landings.
I'd argue that the PCS categories of performance, interpretation, and composition are subjective, due to cultural differences. And you shouldn't win by PCS if you have technical errors, unless there is literally no better option because there has to be a winner. See 2014 Olympics men's competition.But would she have won if she was better in PCS than Anna, with all the tech error she had? So how does the PCS not matter?
Nathan was always artistic but got pushed in the direction of jump, jump jump by his coach and the federation. After the 2018 Olympics and turning 18, he decided to make artistry a priority also. I think Ilia will do the same after seeing the results of the free skate. I miss Nathan also, but we still have Jason.Thanks for that, you made my day! Miss you, dearest Nathan!
I'll be there to keep you company 16 hours from now if I can tell time correctlyI'm still so hyped, I'm even considering watching the gala tomorrow. And I don't usually like exhibition programs.![]()
Ha Been a Stephane fan for awhile. I fondly remember a fan in another forum saying this costume looked like a pot holder(I think because of the quilting like thickness of the fabric). Fond memories..Thank you.yes, they were
![]()
Yes. Shun Sato and Kao Miura come to mind. Ilia is better than both of them in two out of three PCS categories.Surely, there are skaters who have great skating skills, but poor interpretation, for example?
He is not allowed to coach, Sylvia has always coached Kevin. John coached pairs teams Before being suspended.The last groups in all events have this "everybody deserves a medal" vibe and my nerves are shot
Quick question if you know : Kevin Aymoz is coached by John Zimmerman (amongst others) and I read this coach was suspended by the Safesport organization for having pressured a teen into not reporting a d. pick sent by another skater.
Hence I'm super relectant with Aymoz...
What do you guys think?
Subjective.....both those ladies are Russian. So if you still feel there is bias in that judging, and 'due to cultural differences' , then I say you hang on to that theory, just not many will buy into it.I'd argue that the PCS categories of performance, interpretation, and composition are subjective, due to cultural differences. And you shouldn't win by PCS if you have technical errors, unless there is literally no better option because there has to be a winner. See 2014 Olympics men's competition.
Rafael is not happy. And I don't care. That was fair.
But Ilia will hopefully be a legend.![]()
Yes I am with u on balance. How many skaters won on tech and prop up pcs or artistic that includes Olympic. We could list those who won on tech and prop up artistic or artistic and prop vup overlook tech issues. The balance is not how I see it but the judges, caller tech panel. Let's face it we have conversations over the outcome for years. Hence judged sport, beauty is in eye of who sees and interprets it. We don't agree with how each other sees interpretation.I did not say Ilia just jumped quads and didn't do anything else.
I simply expressed that doing as many quads as possible is not enough when all aspects of skating are being considered (independently) in scoring and are being rewarded accordingly.
In fact, I was not just thinking of Ilia when I typed out that comment. He's far from the only one who is beaten by skaters with lower technical content because they are more complete and well-balanced skaters. Or skaters with better PCS who are beaten by skaters that are weaker in PCS but have high enough TES scores to make up for the deficit.
The whole point of this scoring system (even if that was seemingly forgotten in some aspects for years) was to reward both technical and artistic prowess, i.e. balance!
Thank you for your explanation. What I don't understand is that he is listed as Aymoz's coach on the ISU website : http://www.isuresults.com/bios/isufs00014227.htmHe is not allowed to coach, Sylvia has always coached Kevin. John coached pairs teams Before being suspended.
If it's the program interpretation, then sure, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But to notice the cleanness of lines in the ice work or in the body position, there is not to look much between the lines when there is a gulf in between.Yes I am with u on balance. How many skaters won on tech and prop up pcs or artistic that includes Olympic. We could list those who won on tech and prop up artistic or artistic and prop vup overlook tech issues. The balance is not how I see it but the judges, caller tech panel. Let's face it we have conversations over the outcome for years. Hence judged sport, beauty is in eye of who sees and interprets it. We don't agree with how each other sees interpretation.
@elektra blue One more time, cue the ugly cry gif.