- Joined
- Aug 8, 2023
Yes, the Olympics could be doing fine. I have no idea. However I dont see anyone invoking viewership as any evidence to the contrary. The arguments users made in this thread acknowledged viewership. The population is exponentially increasing and so is access to technology. Nominal viewership doesnt preclude a loss in energy and attention, or a loss of cultural relevancy. Hence anecdotal real world evidence can be valuable to assessing the holistic cultural success and trending of the games. I am basically sure that Gen-Z and younger really dont care about the games even half as much as the last generations. The old guard might be keeping it alive but pro sport organizations are eating up the energy and attention fast with the new kids. The Olympics can adapt for sure but assuming a stiff-necked trend anecdotally it doesnt look great.I just watched a lot of the world aquatics.
Russians and Belarussians were admitted. A few of them, but don't be fools, some of the most talented Russian young swimmers were able to take part. Some of the posts here are implying only weaker and not established skaters would be eligible. It wasn't the case for swimming.
As a matter of fact, Neutral Athletes B (Russians) won 10 medals. 3 of these medals were even won in relays.
So, of course, world aquatics (formerly FINA) is more permissive than ISU because that wasn't even Olympics nor a qualifying event but short course world championships (25 m pool).
Actually, Paris games were the most watched ever so I am not sure why some have the impression it was a huge debacle.
![]()
Les JO de Paris ont été « les plus suivis de l’histoire »
Les JO de Paris ont été « les plus suivis de l'histoire », regardés par « environ 5 milliards de personnes » à la télévision ou sur plateforme numérique.ici.radio-canada.ca
).