I'm neither a rabid Yu-na or Mao fan (or hater), I happen to like both skaters a great deal, equally.


I know some of you are tired of yet another post on flip/lip, but since there were direct questions asked of me, I feel compelled to answer.
And, still you didn't talked about whether your considered the convention of 1/4 rotation less for judging an UR. I would appreciate your answer.
I have found that borderline 1/4 rotation UR's have often been downgraded in past competitions, with skaters other than Yu-na. Given that even in slow-motion, no one can tell for sure whether a jump is 269-deg or 271-deg rotated, it's not surprising that these tech panels sometimes downgrade these jumps inconsistently. Given how much Yu-na under-rotated on her 3Z this time, I'm not surprised at all that she was downgraded. And given the same criteria, it does seem she got the benefit of doubt with her 3F+3T in the SA LP.
IMHO, just let me re-iterate once more, I very much dislike the whole tech panel ideal. Besides the inherent subjectivity that's bound to cause inconsistency in calling from competition to competition, or skater to skater within a competition, I also dislike it because the definition of 270-deg as the border for "rotated" versus "under-rotated" jumps is so arbitrary! There's no reason why a 271-deg jump should get 5 more points than a 269-deg jump (even if one had the technology to really tell them apart consistently), because it is simply not that much better a jump!
You mentioned inside edge makes inside curve. From her filp video of SA, after straight line entrance after 3 turn, her left foot clearly turns inside just before take-off. But, you said the edge is clearly outside at that moment. Dosen't it contradict with your theory?
I said "typically" inside edge = inside curve. Not so in Yu-na's case. I've already posted two very long threads talking about why Yu-na's flip is a bit of an exception, if I haven't made myself clear already then I don't know how I can do so with more words.