Oh, dear. I don't want to be the OP of this new thread!

Copy a few more earlier posts over!
But, since I am, I suppose I should take this opportunity to address the latest development.
Let's be brutally honest: this ban isn't about the war. If fighting with another country was the requisite for getting banned, there would have been lots of other countries banned too over the years. But they haven't. Because politics has no place in sport. Sport, and entertainment, is all about escaping from politics and the problems of real life. And this has been enshrined in the Olympic ideals.
This ban is about the doping. Making sure competitions are fair is the most important thing in sport. But the previous measures against the doping didn't work. It would be too embarrassing for the governing bodies to admit publically that they didn't work, so they are using the war as a cover story.
So, in that respect, banning members of the coaching team at a club that has questions hanging over it is correct.
But leaving an athlete with no support is not correct. An athlete that already has the eyes of the world glaring down on her because of the situation should not have to sit and get her scores on her own. At least let her have a family member sitting with her.
The thing that is making this embarrassing is that the way that the governing bodies are framing it in the context of the war means that the people the authorities want to ban can only be dealt with in their roles within the Russian and Belorussian teams. They cannot be touched in their roles with other teams.
That we have been seeing members of that coaching team with athletes representing countries other than Russia over the past few years makes a mockery of the whole supposed aim of tackling doping and questionable practices.
As ever, in their attempts to save face, the governing bodies have messed the whole thing up.
CaroLiza_fan