MINUSES:
1. BOOTS ISSUES
There are simply too many skaters fighting with these problems. It is warning.
I definitely wish Junhwan Cha to fix his boot problems! He is capable of great presentation and programs, I would like to see it, instead of worrying that the boot breaks again and will lead to ugly and painfull fall.
Yes, there are skaters with specific shape of foot, of course they can be in trouble of finding the right boots for them. Most of skaters break boot (or make them too loose to be safe for jumping) after some weeks of executing difficult jumps. But more skaters are mentioning break of NEW boot, which is definitely not caused by issue above.
Figure skating is more demanding than ever before, in jumps, steps and spins. Maybe technology of production of boots or blades is missing some important information, which would help to solve issues.
Maybe skaters should start to cooperate more closely with companies producing boots to look for reasons of such issues.
If I am not mistaken athletes participation on developing shoes is used in Athletics - NIKE company.
Is this possible in Figure Skating?
2. GIVE TECHNICAL PANEL ANOTHER CAMERA.
Based on protocols Yuma got 11.2 and 8.8 points for 3F+3Lo and 3A in the second half of the Free Program. But 3loop and 3axel were underrrotated in my opinion - VIDEO below. If jumps were called < than the base value of these jump elements would be 10.142 and 7.04 points, with reduction in GOE as well.
Yuma's base value in Free Program would be about 2.818 points smaller. And another drop with lower GOE for the jump.
If Technical panel would be kind giving just < mark to 3axel, it would drop about 1.760 points. And another drop with lower GOE for the jump.
Getting "q" only for both jump elements would lead to lower GOE - how much, I have no idea.
The difference between Yuma and Shun in overall results was 1.53 points.
I am not sure, what to think about this. Japanese man was clearly the best at NHK Trophy 2025.
When Yuma is clean with 3 different quads, he is the best Japanese man at the moment, no doubt about it.
This week he missed whole spin element in Short Program AGAINST clean program of Shun Sato, he fell and had two "q or <" in Free Program...AGAINST Shun Sato, who was once again clean. Yes, I agree that Shun deserves lower component score comparing to Yuma.
But personally for me THIS WEEK the best men in the field was Shun Sato.
Despite such critics I want to finish on positive note. Both men showed high quality programs.
Let's enjoy some of their jumping elements. (Thanks to lower video quality, it looks better on mobile phone.)
1. BOOTS ISSUES
There are simply too many skaters fighting with these problems. It is warning.
I definitely wish Junhwan Cha to fix his boot problems! He is capable of great presentation and programs, I would like to see it, instead of worrying that the boot breaks again and will lead to ugly and painfull fall.
Yes, there are skaters with specific shape of foot, of course they can be in trouble of finding the right boots for them. Most of skaters break boot (or make them too loose to be safe for jumping) after some weeks of executing difficult jumps. But more skaters are mentioning break of NEW boot, which is definitely not caused by issue above.
Figure skating is more demanding than ever before, in jumps, steps and spins. Maybe technology of production of boots or blades is missing some important information, which would help to solve issues.
Maybe skaters should start to cooperate more closely with companies producing boots to look for reasons of such issues.
If I am not mistaken athletes participation on developing shoes is used in Athletics - NIKE company.
Is this possible in Figure Skating?
2. GIVE TECHNICAL PANEL ANOTHER CAMERA.
Based on protocols Yuma got 11.2 and 8.8 points for 3F+3Lo and 3A in the second half of the Free Program. But 3loop and 3axel were underrrotated in my opinion - VIDEO below. If jumps were called < than the base value of these jump elements would be 10.142 and 7.04 points, with reduction in GOE as well.
Yuma's base value in Free Program would be about 2.818 points smaller. And another drop with lower GOE for the jump.
If Technical panel would be kind giving just < mark to 3axel, it would drop about 1.760 points. And another drop with lower GOE for the jump.
Getting "q" only for both jump elements would lead to lower GOE - how much, I have no idea.
The difference between Yuma and Shun in overall results was 1.53 points.
I am not sure, what to think about this. Japanese man was clearly the best at NHK Trophy 2025.
When Yuma is clean with 3 different quads, he is the best Japanese man at the moment, no doubt about it.
This week he missed whole spin element in Short Program AGAINST clean program of Shun Sato, he fell and had two "q or <" in Free Program...AGAINST Shun Sato, who was once again clean. Yes, I agree that Shun deserves lower component score comparing to Yuma.
But personally for me THIS WEEK the best men in the field was Shun Sato.
Despite such critics I want to finish on positive note. Both men showed high quality programs.
Let's enjoy some of their jumping elements. (Thanks to lower video quality, it looks better on mobile phone.)

