If you look more closely, it really doesn't seem that the French judge was that much of an outlier. For example, the Czech judge gave FB/C a higher score than the French judge did. The Spanish judge gave them only 0.4 less than the French. And the Spanish judge actually ranked C/B third (the French had them second). True, the French Judge gave a much lower score to Chock/Bates than to FB/C (by over 7.5 points). But almost all judges had their national biases.
The American judge also ranked C/B first by over 4 points, the biggest gap in their favour between the two teams out of all judges. They gave Chock/Bates 137.67 while they also gave Piper/Paul 128.89. I and plenty of other people, including one of the other judges, thought Piper/Paul were better on the night, and most other judges had placed a much smaller margin between the two teams. Where is the petition to investigate this?
There was plenty of examples of national bias thoughout the protocol.
The Italian judge ranked the Italians above Piper and Paul.
The Spanish judge gave the top Spanish team (Smart/Dieck) 129.1 while they gave Zingas/Kolesnik (who finished above them in the FD) only 119.59.
The Czech judge gave the Mrazeks a way higher grade than the average. Etc., etc.
And the way the system works, all of the marks the French judge gave C/B were actually removed as the lowest or (in most cases) equally lowest ones, so that's not why they lost the first place.
The American judge also ranked C/B first by over 4 points, the biggest gap in their favour between the two teams out of all judges. They gave Chock/Bates 137.67 while they also gave Piper/Paul 128.89. I and plenty of other people, including one of the other judges, thought Piper/Paul were better on the night, and most other judges had placed a much smaller margin between the two teams. Where is the petition to investigate this?
There was plenty of examples of national bias thoughout the protocol.
The Italian judge ranked the Italians above Piper and Paul.
The Spanish judge gave the top Spanish team (Smart/Dieck) 129.1 while they gave Zingas/Kolesnik (who finished above them in the FD) only 119.59.
The Czech judge gave the Mrazeks a way higher grade than the average. Etc., etc.
And the way the system works, all of the marks the French judge gave C/B were actually removed as the lowest or (in most cases) equally lowest ones, so that's not why they lost the first place.
Last edited:
