Pairs & Dance Teams with Citizenship Issues | Page 3 | Golden Skate

Pairs & Dance Teams with Citizenship Issues

tennisguy

Rinkside
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Shortly after Worlds, I read somewhere that there is some ambiguousness with the rule that if a country can't use a spot (such as a French pair without proper citizenship), that spot always will be awarded at the qualifying event (Nebelhorn this year).

Evidently, it is stated clearly that in cases in which all other countries that earned multiple spots at Worlds would be able to use them, the "unused" spot would be allocated later at the qualifying event (Nebelhorn this year). HOWEVER, there is nothing in writing about cases such as the U.S. pairs, which earned two spots but so far will only have one spot for Olympics.

Does anyone else remember reading something like this?

I've never seen anything ambiguous about the allocation of unused Olympic entries. Olympic entries that countries that earn at the World Championships or at the Qualifying event, and are than unable to fill are reallocated to the next country inline based on the results of the Qualifying event. I've never seen anything (or than wishful thinking from some fans) that would indicate that the US might can an additional entry based on unused entries from another country.
 

Moxiejan

Medalist
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Country
United-States
I've never seen anything ambiguous about the allocation of unused Olympic entries. Olympic entries that countries that earn at the World Championships or at the Qualifying event, and are than unable to fill are reallocated to the next country inline based on the results of the Qualifying event. I've never seen anything (or than wishful thinking from some fans) that would indicate that the US might can an additional entry based on unused entries from another country.

Except that the U.S. wouldn't be getting an "additional" entry. They simply would be getting the two that they earned.
 

chameleon

On the Ice
Joined
May 29, 2014
"Renouncing your allegiance and fidelity" may be part of the oath, but you are still allowed to have other citizenships, and so obviously you are not actually renouncing your allegiance. My parents are immigrants and still are citizens of their birthplace, I believe my uncle has two other citizenships in addition to his American one, as does my grandmother.

Personally, I think that it would be better for the IOC to drop the citizenship requirement. Skaters from small federations often have no choice but to search abroad for partners, and even in countries where there is an abundance of talent, sometimes your perfect match is still abroad. Canada and America have traded skaters back and forth for awhile, for instance.
 
Last edited:

moriel

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
I suppose that's true. Here's a relevant Wikipedia article, and it appears the rules wildly vary around the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

Notably, as far as American citizenship goes, " United States requires applicants for naturalization to swear to an oath renouncing all prior "allegiance and fidelity" to any other nation or sovereignty as part of the naturalization ceremony."

Brazil requires a very similar oath, but still everybody has dual citizenship just fine. In fact, when I got my citizenship, I was just a dummy teen, so when they told me to swear the oath, I freaked out and told them I dont wanna renounce my russian citizenship and its a big deal, to which they told me it was just a formality, basically "well, since you dont have to sign any of that, just read the oath, it will have no effect".
 

TontoK

Hot Tonto
Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Country
United-States
The easier solution to this seems to be to get the IOC to change it rules regarding citizenship changed (they are outdated, and represent a different era of sport) and allow the sports federations to determine who is eligible to compete for which country. If an athlete can compete on a regular basis in international competition for a country, citizen or not, they should be able to compete at the Olympics.

I think this would be a sensible solution.
 

SnowWhite

Record Breaker
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Country
Canada
I don't think "well, it's convenient for me at this moment in my life" is a good selling point. I mean for the country you'd like to join.

Not to mention offhandedly referring to citizenship in said country as a "paper."

Also, not to mention that when you become a citizen, the country you'd like to continue loving is no longer "your" country. You have a new one.

I'm not arguing against NEVER changing citizenship. But I am arguing against it for the sake of convenience or athletic expediency.

Or you have two now. I was involved with a Syrian family who came to Canada as refugees. They don't stop loving Syria or feeling attached to it, but they've come to love Canada too. Different situation obviously, but my point is you can love two countries at once in my opinion.

Most athletes are getting dual citizenship, save for those from countries that don't allow it like Kavaguti who had to give up Japanese citizenship.

People feel a variety of ways about citizenship and what that means to them.

I think this is a super important point. It's different for different people.

I suppose that's true. Here's a relevant Wikipedia article, and it appears the rules wildly vary around the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship

Notably, as far as American citizenship goes, " United States requires applicants for naturalization to swear to an oath renouncing all prior "allegiance and fidelity" to any other nation or sovereignty as part of the naturalization ceremony."

"Renouncing your allegiance and fidelity" may be part of the oath, but you are still allowed to have other citizenships, and so obviously you are not actually renouncing your allegiance. My parents are immigrants and still are citizens of their birthplace, I believe my uncle has two other citizenships in addition to his American one, as does my grandmother.

Personally, I think that it would be better for the IOC to drop the citizenship requirement. Skaters from small federations often have no choice but to search abroad for partners, and even in countries where there is an abundance of talent, sometimes your perfect match is still abroad. Canada and America have traded skaters back and forth for awhile, for instance.

Personally, I think it's kind of a silly oath, considering the US is fine with dual citizenship. Like chameleon says, it's not actually true. You aren't really renouncing anything. If I were ever to get US citizenship, I'd think it was stupid and I probably wouldn't really want to say it, but it wouldn't really matter because I wouldn't be doing it. That line anyways would just be words, since I would still be a dual citizen. I would be gaining a country, not losing one. And TontoK, on the question you asked 4everchan in a later post, I'm proud to be Canadian, and I wouldn't ever actually "renounce my allegiance and fidelity" to Canada. But no matter what the oath says, I just don't view getting dual citizenship as doing that.

well... maybe it's a generation or cultural thing... we don't have military service in canada for instance.... many of us also don't really think the queen is all that cool,unless she is on small pieces of paper that allow us to buy stuff.

I think this is a good point. For example, in my experience (and I know a lot of people who agree), Americans tend to be way more patriotic than Canadians. I don't mean that people aren't proud to be Canadian or anything, but I think that overall patriotism is a much bigger part of American culture than Canadian culture. And then you have the idea of the American "melting pot" vs the Canadian "mosaic". Those are generalizations obviously, and I don't think either country is entirely one or the other, but I do think there are different views on multiculturalism between the two countries. And it's not about one being better, but those differences probably have some affect on the different views regarding citizenship.
 

andromache

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Personally, I think that it would be better for the IOC to drop the citizenship requirement. Skaters from small federations often have no choice but to search abroad for partners, and even in countries where there is an abundance of talent, sometimes your perfect match is still abroad. Canada and America have traded skaters back and forth for awhile, for instance.

I know it's old-fashioned, but I still view the Olympic symbolism as pretty important. You're representing your country, whether it is your country by birth or by adoption, and citizenship is the legal proof of that representation. If you're going to perform in the Olympics for a country, you should take that country seriously enough to become a citizen.

ETA: Competing at the Olympics isn't just another job or athletic competition. It's significant in a different way, and not requiring citizenship would tarnish that significance, IMO.

Plus, dual citizenships! Love your birth country and your new home!
 
Last edited:

TontoK

Hot Tonto
Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Country
United-States
Long Post just above...

I appreciate your input.

This whole discussion has been interesting. Frankly, I wasn't fully aware that USA even allowed dual citizenship, although I did know about the oath.

That said, I'm still holding on to my American citizenship, if for no other reason... I doubt anyone else would have me.

Oddly enough, though, I have tinkered with the idea of moving semi-permanently to another country. Idly googling residency requirements...
 

Crossover

All Hail the Queen
Record Breaker
Joined
Oct 31, 2014
Because of the citizenship issue, Castelli and Tran were not allowed even to compete at 4CC over Cain and LeDuc despite their placement at US Nationals. Of course they are inconsistent, but so are other US pair teams. Unless Tran decides to train in the US and finds a way to attain citizenship quickly, it would be better for him to split the partnership with Castelli and find a Canadian partner representing Canada.
 

moriel

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
I appreciate your input.

This whole discussion has been interesting. Frankly, I wasn't fully aware that USA even allowed dual citizenship, although I did know about the oath.

That said, I'm still holding on to my American citizenship, if for no other reason... I doubt anyone else would have me.

Oddly enough, though, I have tinkered with the idea of moving semi-permanently to another country. Idly googling residency requirements...

Actually, if you have some decent income that allows you to support yourself, many countries would happily take you. Quite a bunch of countries, as far as i know, accept residency by retirement. For example, if Brazil, you can apply for residence if you have 50+ years and an income of U$2000/month (that you can demonstrate).
 

chameleon

On the Ice
Joined
May 29, 2014
I know it's old-fashioned, but I still view the Olympic symbolism as pretty important. You're representing your country, whether it is your country by birth or by adoption, and citizenship is the legal proof of that representation. If you're going to perform in the Olympics for a country, you should take that country seriously enough to become a citizen.

ETA: Competing at the Olympics isn't just another job or athletic competition. It's significant in a different way, and not requiring citizenship would tarnish that significance, IMO.

Plus, dual citizenships! Love your birth country and your new home!

But some countries have extremely strict citizenship requirements. For instance, at the time Takahashi/Tran split, Mervin had never represented any other country internationally, had skated with Narumi for years, and was even willing to renounce citizenship, but the laws were so strict the only way for him to get citizenship was for him to marry Narumi. Which, understandably, was considered a drastic measure. Or the Danish dance team, because there are no high level ice dance coaches in Denmark, she can't get the residency requirement and so they will likely never be able to compete at the Olympics.

Perhaps a compromise would be best. The IOC could change the rules so that you need either citizenship or to have shown a certain level of commitment to representing your country(learning the language if there's a different native language, living there, having represented the country for a certain number of years, etc.)
 
Last edited:

andromache

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
But some countries have extremely strict citizenship requirements. For instance, at the time Takahashi/Tran split, Mervin had never represented any other country internationally, had skated with Narumi for years, and was even willing to renounce citizenship, but the laws were so strict the only way for him to get citizenship was for him to marry Marino. Which, understandably, was considered a drastic measure. Or the Danish dance team, because there are no high level ice dance coaches in Denmark, she can't get the residency requirement and so they will likely never be able to compete at the Olympics.

Perhaps a compromise would be best. The IOC could change the rules so that you need either citizenship or to have shown a certain level of commitment to representing your country(learning the language if there's a different native language, living there, having represented the country for a certain number of years, etc.)

If you are unable to attain citizenship based on X country's rules, should you really represent that country?

For Takahashi/Tran and Laurence/Nikolaj, both couples lived and trained in Canada, and it could be argued that instead of Laurence and Mervin representing and trying to get citizenship for countries they weren't living in, that Nikolaj and Narumi should've gotten Canadian citizenship instead and they should've represented Canada. But if you specifically choose to represent the country that you are not training in because that makes it easier for you to qualify for all events that are not the Olympics (lots of great places to train in Canada = lots of depth and internal competition), then there's a price to pay.

Aliona Savchenko was born in Ukraine, but ever since she partnered with Robin, she has lived and trained in Germany, which, presumably, allowed her to get citizenship that she would've not been able to get if they had instead decided to train in Ukraine. Bruno Massot represents Germany, and lives and trains in Germany, which will presumably make it much easier for him to get German citizenship than if he lived and trained elsewhere.
 

TontoK

Hot Tonto
Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Country
United-States
Actually, if you have some decent income that allows you to support yourself, many countries would happily take you. Quite a bunch of countries, as far as i know, accept residency by retirement. For example, if Brazil, you can apply for residence if you have 50+ years and an income of U$2000/month (that you can demonstrate).

I'll have to investigate. I was actually thinking some place like Hungary, where I think I could live much better in my retirement years than I'd be able to do here.

The problem is that my language is limited to English, and a very small ability in French.
 

NanaPat

Record Breaker
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Country
Canada
Does anyone else remember the Canadian pair Utako Wakamatsu and Jean-Sébastien Fecteau?

She was eligible for Canadian citizenship, but decided not to pursue it because Japan doesn't recognize dual citizenship and she didn't want to give up her Japanese citizenship. They broke up a year after not going to the 2006 Olympics.

A "blast from the past" article about them and also about Aliona Savchenko's citizenship in 2005/6.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/canadians-lead-in-tokyo/article18254402/
 

moriel

Record Breaker
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
I'll have to investigate. I was actually thinking some place like Hungary, where I think I could live much better in my retirement years than I'd be able to do here.

The problem is that my language is limited to English, and a very small ability in French.

In many countries, people tend to speak english a lot (worth researching such locations) because you basically need it to get any decent job.
Also, once you move, you will pick up quickly. Although not sure if Hungary will be the case, but stuff like German and the Latin languages is pretty quick
 

Ice Dance

Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
But if you specifically choose to represent the country that you are not training in because that makes it easier for you to qualify for all events that are not the Olympics (lots of great places to train in Canada = lots of depth and internal competition), then there's a price to pay.

There is. And there is a price to pay when a country like Japan makes it so difficult for athletes to obtain citizenship as well. Namely their final placement during team, pairs, and dance competitions. When it comes to the team event, Japan really shoots itself in the foot. If the country has neither the rink space, nor the coaches to improve their pairs & dance fields, then they aren't providing the infrastructure to develop their own athletes in these disciplines. And the citizenship laws make it extremely difficult for those athletes that have the talent for either dance/pairs to obtain high quality partners elsewhere. Then, their national champions can't compete on the ultimate stage. And thunk, down to last place it may very well be in the pairs discipline during the team event and during the individual Olympic pairs event as well. They have a shot against Korea, but Suzaki & Kihara lost to the Korean juniors by 10 points at 4CCs.
 

TontoK

Hot Tonto
Record Breaker
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Country
United-States
There is. And there is a price to pay when a country like Japan makes it so difficult for athletes to obtain citizenship as well. Namely their final placement during team, pairs, and dance competitions. When it comes to the team event, Japan really shoots itself in the foot. If the country has neither the rink space, nor the coaches to improve their pairs & dance fields, then they aren't providing the infrastructure to develop their own athletes in these disciplines. And the citizenship laws make it extremely difficult for those athletes that have the talent for either dance/pairs to obtain high quality partners elsewhere. Then, their national champions can't compete on the ultimate stage. And thunk, down to last place it may very well be in the pairs discipline during the team event and during the individual Olympic pairs event as well. They have a shot against Korea, but Suzaki & Kihara lost to the Korean juniors by 10 points at 4CCs.

I've lived in Japan, and I am married to a half-Japanese woman.

I'm pretty sure neither the Japanese people nor their government give two hoots about the placement of their ice skating teams in determining immigration policy and citizenship requirements.
 

janav

On the Ice
Joined
May 17, 2014
Does anyone else remember the Canadian pair Utako Wakamatsu and Jean-Sébastien Fecteau?

She was eligible for Canadian citizenship, but decided not to pursue it because Japan doesn't recognize dual citizenship and she didn't want to give up her Japanese citizenship. They broke up a year after not going to the 2006 Olympics.

A "blast from the past" article about them and also about Aliona Savchenko's citizenship in 2005/6.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/canadians-lead-in-tokyo/article18254402/

Yuko Kawaguti faced the same issue. She actually gave up her japanese citizenship in order to get the russian one so she could go to the Olympics. I read somewhere that at some point she'll be allowed to get her japanese citizenship back though.
And didn't Mirai Nagasu have to choose between japanese/US citizenship at one point?
 

Chemistry66

Mmmmm, tacos.
Record Breaker
Joined
Feb 16, 2010
Yuko Kawaguti faced the same issue. She actually gave up her japanese citizenship in order to get the russian one so she could go to the Olympics. I read somewhere that at some point she'll be allowed to get her japanese citizenship back though.
And didn't Mirai Nagasu have to choose between japanese/US citizenship at one point?

Yes, as a Japanese citizen by birth due to her parents' citizenship, Mirai had to choose between Japanese/US Citizenship by age 22.

For the skaters choosing Japan, like the Reeds, it actually may work in their favor. To officially legally renounce U.S. citizenship according to the United States, it must be done in person. What suffices for Japan's purposes may not technically meet US renunciation requirements, which means that the dual citizenship may still remain in some cases
 
Top