The other thing is that I don't know whether this moment is the bounce.
BTW I'm not even the one who started the blame "who started"
Come on Flanker you're certainly not that blind. While I agree that cases like that exist, not everyone is like that. For example I've mentioned Sasha's lip on the very first competition of this season and I stand by it: her flip is a lip. I didn't notice it last year because tbh it was to a smaller degree and I didn't pay that much attention. But I also see that for example Daria should receive at least an ! on her lutz, and I would even be generous not to give an e because it's gotten better this season imo.There are, and were, plenty of people who were complaining about Daria's edge, which should receive "!" on this or that event. It started with them complaining about it at the stage two of the Cup, while the same people (and nobody else before them) didn't complain about Sasha's wrong edge at the same event, that should receive "e", which does more serious impact in the score than uncalled "!". So you definitely have wrong order of events here
I'm sorry then. While I say those are flat edges, I don't know at what moment those pictures were taken, I don't even know whether it is taken in the moment of a jump. If that is truly the moment of a bounce than yes, it should both receive "!", but I say it's not guaranteed what moment it is (and some people who enjoy so called analysis like that aren't truly reliable in this matter). Also I'm not the person who enjoys thousand slowed replays, there are other experts.Well, you didn‘t answer my question. If you say Daria‘s edges are both flat, what would you judge her flip and lutz like?
Good for you then!
Making scenes in public is stupid. What could (maybe?) work for coaches who are dissatisfied with the scores, is talking to respected specialists and judges internationally. If such a person agrees to express an opinion/instruction on what they think to be a more severe fault, what should be judged mildly etc. it could be helpful. Analysing, discussing something seriously in public is much more productive than either talking secretly or shouting murder.
I am not blind, that's why I can clearly say that it definitely is not me or any other fan of Kamila, Daria etc. who immediately after any competition start with those blaming about "corrupted judges" (and be sure many more cases than Sasha's edge could be found if I or a person with similar point of view would truly want).
Anna does nothing but skate a rehearsed choreography. In another forum, a defender of your theory tried to prove how well Anna hears and uses the music by posting a video in which Anna's KP Sasha's music was played and it still looked very good. This fool didn't understand that if he was proving anything, it was exactly the opposite.
Rules are for everyone.
I can give you the number of a good ophthalmologist
Honestly I don't find this a to be a constructive discussion. Instead of essentially calling names, why not present an opinion on why you think that a skater deserves/ doesn't deserve a call etc.
Are they as good with the sniper rifle as me?I can give you the number of a good ophthalmologist
Neither Anna or Sasha fell. They were both clean. I didn't compare skates that weren't (relatively) clean. Comparing Kamila is hard, which is why I didn't, due to her being a junior last year and juniors being scored differently. And also the difficulties in comparing across competitions which only kinda works when everyone is at both competitions.
First, actually. Hate coach bonus.
I would argue if Anna's Lz is a !, Daria's is a e. Especially as Anna doesn't tend to get called internationally. I did think Sasha' was maybe a e live though. So a !. I DO think Daria's should have been an e, though
Remember that I said that I would give Sasha higher score and put her above Daria. As well as I said that Maiia's score is lower than it should. Pretty honestly, without "calling names", because that isn't necessary. That comes from my opinion that it is not like Eteri's skaters are exclusively overscored and others are underscored. That's what I am opposing, because that is wishful thinking IMO.
What?
