- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
Guess we disagree then ... This sort of music, especially during the step sequence, does call for specifically frantic interpretation. And for example, going from the end of the step sequence to the first jump almost all the gestures are done to the music and certainly make sense to me. Especially the theme of transformation. Compare the facial expressions during the earlier parts of the program to them during the latter parts, also.
I guess if you won't get it you won't get it...
Come now, we all see things differently, it's not a case of "not getting it".
To me it lacks flow between the movements as well. It's like... the music asks for sharp movements, not for choppiness. The choreography itself is fine, great even. It just feels like, to me there are times where she pauses between one movement and the next and she's not quite connecting it to the last movement. Not all the time though. There are some wonderful moments, but then between notes she just kind of stops when she should be holding a movement or extending it or something. And it affects the way I see it because instead of thinking why that was movement was great I'm wondering why it's not keeping my attention. Also don't you edit out that you thought it was a masterpiece. I just wanted to try and explain why I disagreed.
"Not getting it" can also mean "you didn't understand it", not "you must see it differently".