- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
I for one do not see anything to be outraged about in the fact that different judges evaluated Brezina's quad differently. In fact, in general I would be more suspicious if all the judges agreed all the time.
Four judges thought the jump was just dandy and gave +2 GOE.
Three judges thought the jump satisfied the required definition for the element and gave 0 GOE (or else saw some extra good points balanced by some flaw in execution).
Two judges saw a flaw somewhere and gave it -1.
After throwing out the higest and lowest, the average of these opinions was +0.71. That seems about right to me, reflecting the consensus.
Should it have been +0.86 instead? I am not going to have a heart attack over it.
Four judges thought the jump was just dandy and gave +2 GOE.
Three judges thought the jump satisfied the required definition for the element and gave 0 GOE (or else saw some extra good points balanced by some flaw in execution).
Two judges saw a flaw somewhere and gave it -1.
After throwing out the higest and lowest, the average of these opinions was +0.71. That seems about right to me, reflecting the consensus.
Should it have been +0.86 instead? I am not going to have a heart attack over it.