chloepoco
But it's not a show, it's a competition.
http://www.skatingjapan.jp/
R.D.
You must understand, I'm not saying she isn't a good person. (No way to know unless we're part of her immediate friends/family circle.) I'm saying that there is often a difference between the way people act when the cameras are rolling, and the way these same people act when the cameras are off. I've seen this firsthand...
Well, this is something obvious... But, btw, we CAN know. If we know at least some of their actions, we can make a judgement.
Her choice of words often times leaves me with the impression that she is going out of her way to be less candid and more PC. Nothing wrong with that, but don't you think for a minute that it means that she's this perfect "can-do-no-wrong" angel.
I don't know about Michelle, but Yuna's choice of words usually makes me feel that she is straightforward, or candid if you want me to say.
(Think Tiger Woods, how he was portrayed by the press and fans before his private dealings came out.) Just like Yuna- so many of her fanboys (or "bots", insert your favorite word here) always MUST blame the other party in case of conflict or controversy. Maybe, guys, it's possible that Yuna took a misstep or two as well? Especially her Twitter outburst? But of course, such action will be defended with blind fandom. It can NEVER be her fault...
Yes, some people do so, I agree. Obviously, Yuna had some faults too, the Twitter is one of those, probably there are more... But, I think, that this action can be defended to the certain extent too, because some people certainly exaggerate the gravity of it, while we don't know the situation. I'm against the blind fandom, I just want to appreciate the true qualities while fully realising the errors and flaws of a person. On the other hand I find that often those true and really presented qualities are misappreciated. And that happens not only with Yuna, but with others too.
It's ok to criticize and not to be a fan or be only fan of skating. What's not ok, I think, is the arrogancy of some people who don't know how to appreciate the others and can't considerate others.
Anyway, not too related to the above, but MK was a guest analyst for NBC sports during their much abbreviated coverage of the 2009 World Championships in LA. Now, the point of an analyst is to dissect the field, each competitor, weigh the strengths and weaknesses among the athletes to reach a prediction as to who might come out on top. She was paired with Dick Button and Bob Costas in the booth. At the conclusion of the broadcast, Costas posed a short series of questions to Button and Kwan. Now, to be fair to MK, Button has a lot more experience as a commentator, and isn't afraid to speak his mind about what he thinks about a particular skater. But what struck me about MK is that she always seemed to go out of her way not to say anything controversial or critical about any of the skaters. Once Costas FINALLY stopped asking her about a possible return (seriously), he then pointed out that only 2 Americans are going to the Olys. MK responded with "but we're improving, Americans are improving" (Button laughed) She clearly tried to put a positive spin on the whole thing.
And so what? Maybe it's her opinion. She may be not a good analyst, that's all.
Idol, hero, same difference to me
The difference is that idol is worshipped blindly, the heroes are not.
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=idol
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=hero
Mathman
But here’s the thing, R.D. Figure skating as not the real world, it is our escape from the real world. Hence the heros (Michelle/Wonderwoman) and ogres (judges).
It's a real world. There is no escape from real world.
Everyone knows that Michelle Kwan is not perfect, but it is so much fun to pretend to believe that she is.
Michelle Kwan is not perfect, but she is much more above the average and she is good enough to be worth of being
loved and admired (edited: instead of "worshipping") for life long. Isn't that true, at least right now?