- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
In ISU publication 1475 the judging panels are announced for the major ISU events for the rest of the year. The ISU chooses only the country, not the individual judges (these are named by the member federations from the list of ISU qualified judges).
http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=712
The procedure for the draw is spelled out in "Rule #582" (it starts on page 119 of the following document):
http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-178078-195296-111175-0-file,00.pdf
As far as I can tell the procedure is that every country that wants to be included in the draw throws their number in the hat, then a panel of 12 counties is chose at random.
So here are my questions (this came up on the JGP finals thread).
1. If all ISU member federations have an equal chance of being drawn, why do we see the same few countries being the lucky winners over and over? (For instance, at the Junior Grand Prix Finals Japan got lucky four times in a row and has a representative on the panel for each discipline).
Is it because many countries do not have any qualified judges? Because many counties choose not to submit any names?
2. Would it be better to have some kind of geographical distribution? Or rotate the counties so that the same ones don't judge every event?
http://isu.sportcentric.net/db//files/serve.php?id=712
The procedure for the draw is spelled out in "Rule #582" (it starts on page 119 of the following document):
http://www.isu.org/vsite/vfile/page/fileurl/0,11040,4844-178078-195296-111175-0-file,00.pdf
As far as I can tell the procedure is that every country that wants to be included in the draw throws their number in the hat, then a panel of 12 counties is chose at random.
So here are my questions (this came up on the JGP finals thread).
1. If all ISU member federations have an equal chance of being drawn, why do we see the same few countries being the lucky winners over and over? (For instance, at the Junior Grand Prix Finals Japan got lucky four times in a row and has a representative on the panel for each discipline).
Is it because many countries do not have any qualified judges? Because many counties choose not to submit any names?
2. Would it be better to have some kind of geographical distribution? Or rotate the counties so that the same ones don't judge every event?