This was dated February 8th:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/s...ating-deal-includes-an-odd-alliance.html?_r=0
The report claimed that the Russians and USFS colluded to rig the Team, Pairs, and Dance competitions.
Team:
The deal saw Russian and US blocs rig the Team Event for Russia, who was in competition with Canada. Many people noted that Plushenko and Lipnitskaia received wildly inflated scores, and indeed the result was accurately predicted ... Russia won.
Pairs:
The deal saw Russian and US blocs rig the Pairs competition for Russia. The Americans were not competitive in this event, but received a trade-off in the Ice Dance. V/T of Russia made obvious mistakes (hand on ice) that were not penalized through corruption, and the wildly inaccurate scores forced their competitors to go for broke in the LP (not that it would have mattered anyway). Regardless whether one thinks the placements were correct or not, the evidence points to a fix because of the scoring inaccuracies for V/T. Result ... as the scandal predicted, Russia won.
Mens:
Neither the Russians nor Americans were competitive in this event, and arguably it was the most fairly and accurately judged event of the entire Olympics.
Ice Dance:
The Americans were top contenders vs. the Canadians, and according to the deal, the Americans received Russian support to fix this contest, in return for their cooperation in the previous mentioned events. There is historically little scoring difference between the top ice dance teams, but at these Olympics the Americans' score was far and away greater than the Canadians ... this bias ensured that the Americans, like the Russians in Pairs, could make mistakes and still win no matter what was done on the ice. Not surprisingly, the outcome predicted by the scandal was confirmed, and the Americans won.
Ladies:
The ladies event was not mentioned in the scandal article before the Olympics, but circumstantial evidence points to this competition being involved in the collusion as well. For one, the scoring discrepancies were not just limited to the Free Skate in the Ladies Event ... it started with the short program, where there was no Russian judging bloc. Despite American and more western judges in the short program, Kim and her 3Lz+3T barely lead Sotnikova and her 3T-3T. Sotnikova was in fact also inexplicably ahead of Kostner. Gold also had her scores wildly inflated compared to the top ladies. This indicates that the Americans were further involved with the Russians in conspiring to fix the Ladies result.
Those three -- Sotnikova, Lipnitskaia, and Gold -- the Russians and the Americans linked together again.
Without collusion, none of the Russian or American ladies could overtake a clean Kim, Asada, or Kostner. Mao Asada had a disaster in her short program, but even had she skated clean she would have inexplicably lost to a clean Sotnikova, Lipnitskaia, and Gold. Kim and Kostner would have lost too. Inexplicably, if all the skaters had gone clean, it would have been 1. Sotnikova 2. Lipnitskaia 3. Gold or 1. Lipnitskaia 2. Sotnikova 3. Gold with Kim, Asada, and Kostner getting nothing.
This shows what a farce the ISU and the IOC are and why nobody cares to watch figure skating. It's unfortunate that there are articles about match fixing in major French, British, Canadian, and American newspapers, and millions of people have signed petitions to investigate the judging at these competitions, and that any real-time thread you choose to read of the events is full of comments mocking the scores.
What an embarrassment for the sport of figure skating, if you can even call it that anymore.