Are Lakernik and Alla FAMILY of Adelina?
As many have pointed out, the head of the KSU was a judge at Vancouver where Yuna won OGM, yet nobody raised a stink about conflict of interest then?
The case of the KSU and Yuna's fans can be summarized as follows:
1) Yuna didn't win Olympic Gold, so there MUST be corruption and fraud
2) Since there MUST be fraud so WHO are the ones most likely to have committed them?
3) They MUST be the Russians or ex Soviet nationals.
4) A Russian judge hugged Adelina, so she MUST have committed fraud.
5) Tech Controller is Russian, so therefore MUST have committed fraud.
6) Those who gave POSITIVE GOEs to Adelina MUST have committed fraud.
7) Those who DIDN'T award Yuna Level 4s and POSITIVE GOEs MUST have committed fraud.
Therefore the Sochi results are FRAUDULENT.
Yuna didn't win = Corruption.
Note to this date, there's no concrete evidence of fraud, just staunch and emotional opinions.
If the rules are examined, Adelina receiving -0.9 for her stumble in her combination jump is correct, as it was an over rotated jump and the other jumps in the combination were fine. So she was penalized for that last small jump and -0.9 is correct UNDER THE RULES.
Yet Yuna's fans' logic is : There was a stumble, Adelina's performance wasn't perfect, so Yuna should win because she skated more perfectly and there wasn't an obvious flaw in her performance!
Again, as many of us pointed out, Adelina gamed the CoP better than Yuna, she did win fair and square. This has nothing to do with whom is the better skater, etc., it was a sports competition, with specific rules, whom ever played by the rules on that evening to score higher, won.
If Mao hadn't fallen during SP, she would have gamed Sochi and won over Yuna. Yuna didn't bring her A game to Sochi, and with one of the lowest BV among the top tier, left the door opened for Mao, as well as Adelina, Julia and Caro, IF they were to skate relatively clean. I can understand her strategy - her opponents have shown very little consistency in the lead up to Sochi. At GPs, Nationals, Euro, etc., Mao, Adelina and Caro all couldn't skate clean, Mao even lost to Akiko in Japan, and Julia, though more consistent than the others, still looks like a mere slip of a girl. Playing slow and steady could win over more ambitious programs which were highly likely to result in a splatfest, like the Men's. Mao indeed failed to deliver her SP, however, the other two, Caro and Adelina, surprisingly skated their cleanest, and became a threat because of their higher BV.
Free Skating – Panel of Judges : Home Cooking System : Technical Controller : Lakernik Alexander (Russia : Russian federation's former vice-president), Assistant Technical Specialist : Baranova Olga (Russian naturalized : Finland, have coached in Russia), Judges : Zanna Kulik(estonian-soviet union), Yuri Balkov(no need to mention), Shekhovtseva Alla(wife of russian federation general director) , Replay Operator: Alexander Kuznetsov(russian)
Okay let's just assume that these judges may have judged without bias and with honesty.
Then would you like to explain why these statistical analysis indicates that the judging was clearly biased?
http://www.mediafire.com/view/q5f5ycxtb4w3g4u/SochiStatAnalysis.pdf
http://www.mediafire.com/view/3g8cai3hcbsovlt/SochiStatAnalysis_v2.pdf
If you keep keep repeating something endlessly, no matter what, it becomes true, a fact. 
You said that you don't agree with the final result, which also can be interpreted as you don't agree with those judges' decision. It's very easy to explain. This is what I would call seghe mentali (Mental masturbation would be in english?).
Sorry but it's pathetic really. A statistical analysis for a "possibility of a bias", made by someone who maybe watches FS once in 4 years and "Obviously, I’m not qualified to comment the results" as per his own words, and have no idea who gave what?! I don't agree with the final result, but I don't have to engage myself in statistical data which proves absolutely nothing.
But he can definitely study how scoring system works and make statistical analysis out of it. The analysis was written under the notion that the judges have scored without bias. Statistics just confirms what everybody already knows. :yes: And it is an unbiased information I should say.
Not I say so, but many people say so. and are being suspicious of that panel. Just look at those panels. I am not saying that they definitely contributed to the scandal. But it definitely looks questionable and suspicious, concerning that the results were unfair.
Of course that Italian Physicist(member of CERN) didn't watch FS very often. He even stated in his powerpoint that he is not very knowledgeable in FS on a technical part.
It's my fault probably, I'm not too keen in statistics.
^
Well, it made sense for Mathman
I guess that's how it's meant, to make sense for people who have the respective background.
So, it's still up to the human beings to decide and endure the sufferings of not agreeing upon something
I really do hope we can continue to keep that privilege.
Actually I was hoping for that secretly from Day 1- to have one more Jamie Sale the Loser. What a shame it won't happen. Okay, I will deal with Yuna as just with the athlete who can't lose with grace.
We all forgot that Yuna is the only one who has the right to give disrespectful cooments about specific country: "Japanese girls ruined my practice. Mao Japanese fans put sunflower on ice." Blah-blah.
I agree that the only one who was robbed in Sochi was Caro. Her silver was gifted to Yuna who was worse in all accounts. If Caro got deserved silver, then Yuna fans would be whining about Italian consipracy because Cinquanta is Italian. THERE IS ALWAYS CONSPIRACY WHEN YUNA DOESN'T WIN!!!!!!
I didn't word myself well enough. It should not be "shall not be a member of ISU" but "should not be a member of ISU" (if it is the right wording). I mean to object the presence of Russia in panel is possible only if Russia was not a member of ISU in Sochi and therefore couldn't be on panel in the first place. Of course it's not the case. Yuna fans are now playing racists card. Actually they were doing that from Day 1. Like with Estonian's Kulik or Finnland's Baranova. If there were called Kuusik or Wirkkala, they wouldn't be on Yuna fans' black list.
, Yuna fans will be whining rivers , all of use will have to deal with their multi-pages multi-threads nonsence 
occasionally finding it amusing . 
I fully agree with you, but this discussion has turned out to be not about the content of that KOC/KSU complaint but the content of our complains.
That’s what I’m saying! Samsung could do this easily
Even if technology can’t replace judges –it can’t happen instantly anyway, it’s just common sense; the system has to be developed and tested first - it would be a valuable source of data, statistics, and trivia that both public and media like.
