When a Waltz Is Not a Waltz: Penalties/Changes | Page 4 | Golden Skate

When a Waltz Is Not a Waltz: Penalties/Changes

So I take it no one can say if it's correct or not? :cry:
I asked my wife to count, and she had exactly 198 bpm with constant tempo during both 1RW and 2RW (she's no musician too). I want to know if their waltz part of the SD meet the requirements, and the problem is only with other rhythm?

And I thought Weaver/Poje's 'Elvis waltz' was to 6/8 not to 3/4. :shrug: Too bad most judges and technical panels are no musicians also and can't or afraid to call for a deduction where it's clearly needed. Same goes for Hubbel/Donohue. :disapp:

The requirement is 66 x 3 = 198 +- 3 bpm, so 201 bpm = 198 + 3 bpm is on the borderline. I guess it's probably OK.
 
I was getting around 170 bpm, but I'm tired so maybe I'm not counting right. Someone did say that C/B's polka was problematic because it doesn't have a constant tempo, so maybe that was it.
 
It appears that Ippolito/Preiss got 2 point deduction for foxtrot section which is titled 'Murder on the Orient Express Foxtrot'
 
I'm not a musician either, but seeing how different people here are getting different bpms it is not be surprising to me that they would choose another piece of music...
 
It appears that Ippolito/Preiss got 2 point deduction for foxtrot section which is titled 'Murder on the Orient Express Foxtrot'

http://fsrussia.ru/results/1516/CSRUS2015/CSRUS2015_IceDance_SD_Scores.pdf

Indeed they did, and so did Kim & Minov of Korea.

Plus the way the penalty was applied to Kim & Minov leads me to believe it was also for the second rhythm.

I have not seen this even once, let alone twice in an event.

No wonder C&B and W&P are scrambling to change their SD's.
 
In the ice network commentary, Tanith did a stellar job in explaining the music violation situation in a clear way.
 
In the ice network commentary, Tanith did a stellar job in explaining the music violation situation in a clear way.

Maybe there's a link where we can read her explanation?
 
The UKR team Alexandra NAZAROVA / Maxim NIKITIN got a music tempo deduction of -1 in their SD at the Skate America. What is the difference between music tempo deduction and music requirements violation?
 
The UKR team Alexandra NAZAROVA / Maxim NIKITIN got a music tempo deduction of -1 in their SD at the Skate America. What is the difference between music tempo deduction and music requirements violation?

Music tempo deduction applies only when there's a violation of music tempo specifications. The requirements for this season are 198 +/-3 bpm for RW pattern, and constant tempo for the second chosen rhythm. Only Referee is responsible for this, the deduction for this is 1 point.

While music requirements violation applies when other requirements, such as designated rhythms and themes, or 3/4 time, were not met. Deduction can be applied by majority of the judging panel with referee. This deduction is 2 points.
 
Could I get the info when she did that explanation?

IIRC, Tanith said some officials didn't think Dark Eyes worked as a polka. I got the impression the problem was with the second rhythm, rather than the waltz. In the new S/D Madi and Evan are doing a foxtrot instead of a polka.
 
Maybe there's a link where we can read her explanation?

To sum it up Tanith mentioned the judges want that CONSTANT three down beat.one strong beat following by two softer notes: So 1!-2-3 1-2-3! (! symbolizing the down beat) And while 6/8, in theory could work the problem is that osme of the music is more at risk of going 1!,2, 3,4, 5, 6 than 1!, 2, 3, 4!,5, 6!

She also mentioned that waltz is expected to stay within a certain tempo range.
 
IIRC, Tanith said some officials didn't think Dark Eyes worked as a polka. I got the impression the problem was with the second rhythm, rather than the waltz. In the new S/D Madi and Evan are doing a foxtrot instead of a polka.
Well, I don't know, I didn't see the 'polka' as a problem to be honest. But the tempo of second rhythm clearly was not constant.

To sum it up Tanith mentioned the judges want that CONSTANT three down beat.one strong beat following by two softer notes: So 1!-2-3 1-2-3! (! symbolizing the down beat) And while 6/8, in theory could work the problem is that osme of the music is more at risk of going 1!,2, 3,4, 5, 6 than 1!, 2, 3, 4!,5, 6!

She also mentioned that waltz is expected to stay within a certain tempo range.

And I don't understand this too. How can 6/8 can even possibly work, when it's required by rules to skate RW to 3/4?
And I still don't see a problem with their 'Dark eyes' waltz, it was 1!-2-3, 1!-2-3. Tempo is a different story, when I count it looks to me like they're in 198+/-3 bpm range, but other people say otherwise, so it must be something wrong with me. I asked one musician to check the tempo of their RW pattern, I'm expecting the answer soon :biggrin:

Edit: I still can't believe they changed their 'Dark eyes' for this...
 
Last edited:
And I don't understand this too. How can 6/8 can even possibly work, when it's required by rules to skate RW to 3/4?
And I still don't see a problem with their 'Dark eyes' waltz, it was 1!-2-3, 1!-2-3. Tempo is a different story, when I count it looks to me like they're in 198+/-3 bpm range, but other people say otherwise, so it must be something wrong with me. I asked one musician to check the tempo of their RW pattern, I'm expecting the answer soon :biggrin:

I guess some teams thought that there was some how a 3/4 beat despite being 6/8? Who knows. I'll be looking forward to hearing from your friend. :)
 
I guess some teams thought that there was some how a 3/4 beat despite being 6/8? Who knows. I'll be looking forward to hearing from your friend. :)

Weaver/Poje's Elvis waltz was to 6/8, if my ears don't lie to me :biggrin:
 
First, I wanted to thank everyone who has provided insightful responses on this thread. It has been awesome.

Could I get the info when she did that explanation?

I believe she gave the explanation during the warm-up before the final group. (I cannot say how grateful I am to have Tanith providing real DANCE commentary here).

I think the confusion between 6/8 and 3/4 comes from the fact that 6/8 reduces to 3/4. Mathematically they are equal. Musically, it appears this is not so.

Does anyone know what portion of the music N&N received their tempo deduction on? They did not receive one during the U.S. Classic.
 
Music tempo deduction applies only when there's a violation of music tempo specifications. The requirements for this season are 198 +/-3 bpm for RW pattern, and constant tempo for the second chosen rhythm. Only Referee is responsible for this, the deduction for this is 1 point.

While music requirements violation applies when other requirements, such as designated rhythms and themes, or 3/4 time, were not met. Deduction can be applied by majority of the judging panel with referee. This deduction is 2 points.

IIRC, Tanith said some officials didn't think Dark Eyes worked as a polka. I got the impression the problem was with the second rhythm, rather than the waltz. In the new S/D Madi and Evan are doing a foxtrot instead of a polka.

First, I wanted to thank everyone who has provided insightful responses on this thread. It has been awesome.

I believe she gave the explanation during the warm-up before the final group. (I cannot say how grateful I am to have Tanith providing real DANCE commentary here).

I think the confusion between 6/8 and 3/4 comes from the fact that 6/8 reduces to 3/4. Mathematically they are equal. Musically, it appears this is not so.

Does anyone know what portion of the music N&N received their tempo deduction on? They did not receive one during the U.S. Classic.


Thank you for you all. The subject of how to handle SD music is a new eye opener for me, a sort of newbie to ice dance.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what portion of the music N&N received their tempo deduction on? They did not receive one during the U.S. Classic.

I watched, and rewatched, and rewatched it, and came to the conclusion that it's for their March part. During partial step sequence the tempo is constant at first, then it became slower for a couple of seconds and then faster again, so it's not constant. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't hear anything else that might fit for tempo violation deduction. :scratch:

We'll see at their next event if they will change something in their SD, so it'll be the answer :biggrin:
 
Thank you. They're scheduled for Tallinn Trophy. (Currently a pretty awesome dance field for a senior B event: Coomes & Buckland, Tobias & Tkachenko, Testa & Csolley, Hawayek & Baker, Cannuscio & McManus). Though I suspect one or both of those first two teams will grab GP spots instead, in the absence of Hurtado & Diaz.
 
First, I wanted to thank everyone who has provided insightful responses on this thread. It has been awesome.



I believe she gave the explanation during the warm-up before the final group. (I cannot say how grateful I am to have Tanith providing real DANCE commentary here).

I think the confusion between 6/8 and 3/4 comes from the fact that 6/8 reduces to 3/4. Mathematically they are equal. Musically, it appears this is not so
.

Does anyone know what portion of the music N&N received their tempo deduction on? They did not receive one during the U.S. Classic.

for those interested, if you haven't seen it before...

6/8 is a compound meter. compound meter means that each beat is a combination of 3 smaller units...
in this case: the smaller unit is the eighth note...and the bar is made out of TWO beats containing 3 of these eighth notes (dotted quarter note).

3/4 is a regular meter. It consists of THREE beats. each beat is a quarter note.

A waltz is traditionally a dance composed on a 3/4 meter... with a clear downbeat and two lighter beats... OUM-Pa-Pa. Often, there is a pick-up leading to the downbeat so a clear sense of hierarchy is established in the rhythm.

IF a piece in 6/8 would consist of regular eighth note beats all the way through... 1 + + 2 + + , it may confuse a listener in thinking that ONE bar is indeed TWO bars of a waltz... or something like two bars of 3/8 after another BUT the issue here is that
1) most pieces in 6/8 will feature other beat subdivisions
2) the hierarchy of the meter is no longer equal to a waltz... as those two 3/8 bars wouldn't have the same kind of clear Oum-Pa-Pa because in 6/8 the hierarchy of the beats is the following... ONE.... two..... or when divided.. ONE ++ two ++.... the second beat is indeed weaker... and the pick up into ONE isn't of the same nature at all as the one in Dance.... and there is very rarely a pick up into two... so to make it into a waltz pattern is very problematic.

I hope this musical explanation helps you understand why some choreographers may have issues.... I am NOT a figure skating expert, so perhaps the waltz patterns can fit into some sort of alternative meter other than the WALTZ proper rhythm that is in 3/4.

Teams who are going with classical music indeed do have an easier time since composers observed the Waltz's original features with a clear downbeat and sense of OUM-pa -pa....

however, when going for non-classical music, some composers or songwriters often play with multiple rhythmic patterns, some going from 3/4 to 6/8 so sometimes, one may have the impression of hearing a waltz pattern but it isn't regular or may shift... creating the issues mentioned with P/C... I couldn't hear a clear waltz at all when I listened to the music selection... however, I have not seen the program nor the final cuts... so who knows?

again, hopefully this is helping a few ... and if not :) sorry ;) you can just skip this long explanation ;)

PS: it is also important to mention that not all 3/4 meters are Waltzes ;) for instance, a Mazurka is in 3/4... it is slightly differently organized rhythmically... whether or not this could affect the dance patterns I don't know...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top