Oh no not just the PCS, Nathan's GOEs are worth complaining about too. Look, if this is the 6.0 system and Nathan did by far the best of the night nobody would have said anything. But this is the IJS, the supposedly objective system that doesn't matter what competition you are in. A 9 in SS is supposed to mean the same thing across competition. So people have the right to complain when Nathan's scores or Shoma's scores do not match the standard of the 9s/8s seen in the last few years.
And nobody is mad Nathan win for god's sake. Of course he deserves the win.
It is naive to think this sport is ever going to be so-called "objective". No matter how you tweak the rules, it is always going to be subjective, in some ways.
Back in 2005-2006, I don't remember seeing any 9s in PCS.
8's were considered great, excellent back then.
These days, the judges hand out 9s like candy bars.
Wait, I should say 10s.
You think PCS should be an absolute value across competitions?
In my opinion, this scoring system is still quite subjective, and I fear it will always be, including GOEs.
Like someone else said, the judges gave 88.86 points in PCS to Shoma with a very flawed performance.
Thus, the judges would have no choice but to boost up Nathan's PCS with a much cleaner and way more difficult program.
You may disagree, but this is how it played out.
Also, I will certainly not try to justify the scores. I did not hand out the scores, so I don't see why I have to justify them.
You may question the scores, but it is your opinion. Many may disagree with you.
That is exactly what I mean by subjectivity of the sport.
Now, keep on complaining...