- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
If health is a concern, it makes more sense to look at the elements that are dangerous, such as, yes, quads. Because they do the same things in juniors and train for juniors just as much as they do for seniors. They start at 4 or 5 years of age, so by the time they are 15, they have a decade of doing what other children don’t do and can’t do.
The statistical sample on the skaters will never be representative in that respect, they are simply an exceptions of exceptions, it will be looking at the cloud of outliers.
Any sort of scientifically based cut off is going to be 19-20 yo, aligned with the end of growth. But at that point most people should be half way through university.
I have already addressed why I don't adhere to the "they will train anyway" argument, although I realize not everyone is hanging on my every word

But I do not see a path to agreement, and that is OK, people don't need to agree. I only jump in when I see arguments about motivations or inconsistencies. It's only inconsistent if you already think 15 year olds should skate senior.
It may be incorrect, in an opposing view, but not inconsistent. That was my only point.
Last edited:



