Things that stood out to me after going through this entire thread:
1. I seem to be the only one who really doesnt like the re-addition of somersaults. Just an obvious grasp for tiktok clips over a mundane gimmick. I dont want it. Let the dopamine addicted tiktokers watch basketball or something.
2. Pairs age gaps should be limited to 5 years for juniors, in my opinion. 7 years isnt ludicrous but I want less. Its a step. The 13-23 proposal is egregious and honestly suspicious (borderline criminal).
3. I dont think the quad changes are targeting Ilia. I dont see the evidence for that claim. Like others have said its been in the thoughts for a long time. I dont mind the quad changes in general. A total 0 for a fall is pushing it IMO but I dont feel too strongly about it.
4. This entire debate about "x-games" versus choreography is only describable, from my perspective, with adjectives that would probably get me banned; simply put I find it extremely... stupid and dishonest on both sides.
Anyone who claims that impressive jumps on their own are an equal to the traditional deep essence of skating just doesnt even like figure skating. Its not honest at all to take the position that "its opinion" and everyone has their "own preferences" or that its equal in its own way because its "exciting" or "evolutionary". Sorry but nobody wants to see the most athletic ballerina's extensions and soft landings as an isolated athletic feat without any musicality, at least, not as an organized prolonged interest (maybe for tiktok clips, as aforementioned in my first point, which this sport should NEVER fall to). Its just not a thing no matter how much you hide and crutch with subjectivity. If Bazyluk jumped as she did now, with her current choreo, however that represented her at artistic maturity, I wouldn't even be that impressed. Jumps could be the beautiful petals of skating but choreography and delicate expression is the nectar itself.
So skaters shouldn't be able to jump quads and win without choreo, obviously... but the issue for me is that I dont know when this has ever really happened... Its a total strawman. The only supposed examples are Malinin and Trusova, and:
Malinin's choreo is not amazing but its in no world below average across all male competitors. He has unproblematic choreo, its exciting and gives personality and its totally reasonable for him to settle with artistic acceptability in the pursuit for athletic excellence. He does have energy and its by no means empty. I suppose Dikidzhi is an example of genuinely poor choreo with good scores just from tech, which I dislike, but he definitely wouldnt actually win anything internationally anyways (maybe a bronze if the stars were his that day? with a 4A?), and he didnt even win in Russia so its not really a point.
Trusova gets hated on so bad for literally zero reason. At this point there is nothing left that I get worked up over on this forum (not even the Kamila case - not invested anymore) but this persisting slander really takes my patience. She had one "bad" program (Cruella) and guess what, she lost the gold off PCS on that program because she didnt get every jump perfect across the tournament, exactly as everyone says it should be and as it happened. So where is the problem? Her Frida had good choreo, so did her Appassionata and Romeo & Juliet. She is not an icon of bad choreography at all. People just singled her out because her tech was revolutionary while her choreo wasnt, but at worst her choreo was average like Malinin (I think much better but that isnt the point) and no worse, and because of that she isnt OGM. Everyone liked her so naturally the "non-conformists" had to slander her entire career over one experimental free skate to fight in (and basically invent totally) some imaginary war of skating philosophy in their head.
Literally who are these people arguing against? I dont know. Did Shcherbakova have bad choreo? Is someone going to bite that bullet? Akateva? I hope someone does because I wont even try to argue back - I'll just give you a like in impression with your dedication. I shouldnt continue name dropping but you guys arent even arguing against a strawman at this point its some completely nonexistent phantom of the imagination that nobody is even trying to defend. I dont understand.
Quads might be a bit overpowered with falls, and like I said the changes could be great to make quads "riskier" and reward artistry/other delicate elements more. But the point is that the vast majority of "quadsters" have good choreo and spins and what ever else anyways. And those that didnt paid the price historically. Theres just no evidence supporting that this argument should even exist in the first place.