- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
They definitely should be ahead of Z/K IMO. I’m really surprised by that.TBH T/T should be 3rd![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They definitely should be ahead of Z/K IMO. I’m really surprised by that.TBH T/T should be 3rd![]()
TBH, I’m surprised they managed to stay in 2nd place too but it’s a bit like when C/B fell at worlds and still managed to win.I get that the fall for L/L was during an element but it took them a good 15 seconds to get back into the performance. I see their PCSs as a bit high for that error.
Good analysis. Of course, you were very right about Lim/ Quan, but not about Lopareva/ Brissaud. I think L/B are political favorites as the top French team. For sure, though, L/B are not better than Z/K, TT, or even The Browns. All these teams are on a par. L/B are that quirky French team, amusing to watch and very consistent, but not really better than teams they are being placed ahead of.I don’t see L/Q ahead these two or L/B if all skate well.
Gage Brown, stiff???I don't know... I am the only one who doesn't appreciate the Browns as much as everyone else. I felt he was quite stiff and I don't like their lines and posture
TBH T/T should be 3rd![]()
Well, C/B did pay for it by dropping below Fear/ Gibson and not winning overall at SkAm. I don't like Evan's costumes and the jury is out on their choice to use so many music cuts, so C/B may be in some trouble maintaining top dog status this season.totally agree. Their PCS were hit and they got the normal deduction. I have no problem with that.
Last week, I had a problem with the simple fact that Chock and Bates still received some 9.5 in PCS... i mean, so that means that without their fall they would have received 10 ? at their first event of the season ? For something that still needs polishing ? In any case, this time LaLa used their fall not on an element card, while C/B actually fell on an element...
So in American, "brilliant" does not mean excellent/outstanding/amazing/awesome?Well, the Brits do use the word "brilliant" differently than we Yanks (at least the Brits I know). As well as "clever". As well as ... I'll stop here, the post will go on forever.
But with "World Champions", we are not divided by a common language.
Umm, first of all, Fear/Gibson do not have the best skating skills 'from the rest of the pack'. F/G are just a very entertaining team coached by a center with political pull. And F/G have veteran rep status. Also, when you say the Georgians are 'gaining traction', you must mean politically. Gleb does have very good skating skills, and Lewis Gibson does too, but their partners definitely do NOT.I think the top 5 teams (C/B, G/P, G/F, F/G, and L/L) are viewed by the judges to have much better skating skills overall than the rest of the pack (there other teams gaining traction like the Georgians,
It tends to be used more to mean either radiant and bright, as in a brilliant light, or to refer to intelligence and cleverness, such as "she has a brilliant mind." We don't tend to use it colloquially to mean amazing or awesome, but understand it if it is used that way.So in American, "brilliant" does not mean excellent/outstanding/amazing/awesome?
Hey, interesting observation about Z/K. I am going to look closely at their FD to see if this holds true in their FD choreography. I, too, think the Browns deserved better scores. L/B are inventive and quirky, but 'not my cup of tea'.Z/K don't do it for me. He's an incredible skater and they are both good performers. However, he literally skates around her while she does simple steps except on required elements. The tricks are there to disguise the lack of real skating from her. Not my cup of tea.
Well, C/B did pay for it by dropping below Fear/ Gibson and not winning overall at SkAm. I don't like Evan's costumes and the jury is out on their choice to use so many music cuts, so C/B may be in some trouble maintaining top dog status this season.
I'd love to see Piper/Paul win in Boston ahead of C/B. I do not like Guignard/ Fabbri's programs either. But G/F will probably stay on the Worlds podium. Fear/ Gibson continue to possess an entertaining vibe, but their programs are not doing anything for me this seaso
I didn't realise that! Thanks for the clarification. We are definitely separated by a common language.It tends to be used more to mean either radiant and bright, as in a brilliant light, or to refer to intelligence and cleverness, such as "she has a brilliant mind." We don't tend to use it colloquially to mean amazing or awesome, but understand it if it is used that way.
I never heard it before this year's RDNo idea who or what Daddy Cool is,
There's another one of those songs (Daddy Cool) that hasn't aged well. The way "Daddy" was used back then is creepy in the here and now. I overlook it in one of my fave Joni Mitchell songs "Carey", but with a song like this, just ick. I have no idea why you'd choose something like this for your RD. It's cringey.I never heard it before this year's RD
Maybe there should be a list of all the 'cringey' lyrics heard in figure skating programs.There's another one of those songs (Daddy Cool) that hasn't aged well. The way "Daddy" was used back then is creepy in the here and now. I overlook it in one of my fave Joni Mitchell songs "Carey", but with a song like this, just ick. I have no idea why you'd choose something like this for your RD. It's cringey.
If you read my post properly, I said in the “judges view” so that applied to the entirety of my post. Also I didn’t just single out F/G - I was talking about the top 5 teams and judges scoring.Umm, first of all, Fear/Gibson do not have the best skating skills 'from the rest of the pack'. F/G are just a very entertaining team coached by a center with political pull. And F/G have veteran rep status. Also, when you say the Georgians are 'gaining traction', you must mean politically. Gleb does have very good skating skills, and Lewis Gibson does too, but their partners definitely do NOT.
No harm intended. I am not being personal nor argumentative. I am honestly responding to what I see. I tend to be straightforward and blunt as a Sagittarian.If you read my post properly, I said in the “judges view” so that applied to the entirety of my post. Also I didn’t just single out F/G - I was talking about the top 5 teams and judges scoring.
It is possible to get your point across while being polite - I’ve noticed you can be very argumentative for no reason at all when you respond to posts you don’t agree with. You can still be nice and disagree.