All the usual strawmans. Yawn. I never said all of her lutzes deserve 'e'. Funny how you ignore other people being scored worse for same/better quality jumps.
A blatant lie. She used to try and hold the outside edge longer, with a classic lutz entry on a long glide, trying to sit on the outside edge. She now does a shorter entry.
Yes, it's no different than a 2Toe deserving +5 GOE if someone actually tried and succeeded in jumping it like that. Nobody tries to do that though, except for one time when Jeremy Ten specifically planned a single-rotation jump with the intent to receive maximum GOE on it, and did eventually get it.
+5 GOE 3Lz(e)< would be incredibly hard to execute, as it would require purposefully landing between forward and sideways, breaking out of the rotation high above the ice specifically at that amount of rotation, landing with great flow and having great body position throughout, while doing a huge jump with lack of pre-rotation.
Being an "ISU" judge is meaningless. It has nothing to do with merit, only a federation happening to submit someone. Considering that I passed all the training, with a top score, and have created rules that were implemented by the ISU and am continually in conversation with ISU committees about rule proposals and things to add to judge training, I am far more qualified than most sitting judges. Your opinion holds zero weight if trying to use this metric, so why are you even writing anything here?
The point was about favouritism and, due to your perceived extent of favouritism towards Sakamoto, you quite erroneously and fallaciously suggested since 2021 she “never ever again” got more than a ! when, in fact, she DID get an e… at literally one of the most important competitions, 2024 Worlds. Not to mention, the many ! she has received since 2021 — including at these Olympics — is contrary to your hella unsubstantiated opinion that she has been incessantly favoured and above scrutiny like the other skaters.
Ah... okay, what I'm getting by "incredibly hard to execute" is that you still think it's possible/alright for someone to be awarded +5 GOE on a 3Lz(e)<. Okay, alright, you do you, boo.
Hah, which rules of yours were implemented by the ISU and where's a source crediting with you as such? I mean, it's nothing compared to the dozens of contributions I've made to the ISU judging system (see, super easy to just claim anything!). You keep parroting "I came up with rules", and I'm asking the emperor to show his clothes, at this point... and share any
actual proof (instead of just pontificating) of your so-called contributions.
Also, the sheer hypocrisy, I can't — you jeer ISU judges as meaningless and unqualified to judge, and yet you are paradoxically SO eager to legitimize yourself, by indicating your remarkably superhuman ability to pass ISU training (which likely hundreds of people, including said judges, have been able to pass), and (allegedly) getting some nugatory "top score" (Nancy Pelosi slow clap for you, gurl). You denigrate this organization and the people it trains, and yet you boast about having passed their training and moreover (supposedly) contribute your time and effort to the very people that you mock! Pick a lane, sis.
In your zeal to claim how supremely qualified you are, you weirdly and consistently neglect to provide any actual evidence of the fruits of your (alleged) ISU training labors... and, I would surmise, have yet never judged any competition of significance.... and yet you astonishingly are resolute in your station as merely a self-aggrandizing, armchair judge, even with having (allegedly) all the qualification yet none of the application (heck, we'll settle for proof of qualification, at this point, lol).
You think you have some edge over us, but gurl, you're "e" at best.
