It's not about whether Caroline will skate as well at World's as she did here if she had the chance, or whether Alissa will finally have a clean skate there. It's about the apparently unfair judging of Caroline and Alissa at National's -- one big rationale for holding up Alissa was that she'd have better potential to help get three spots for the Olympics. That doesn't make bad judging less bad, but it makes it maybe more understandable. But based on 4CC results we can see how fallacious that line of thinking is. Caroline's score here is 3 points higher than Alissa's personal best from three seasons ago, back when her lipping and UR's weren't penalized as they are today, and Caroline's PB is 5 points higher still, which would come easily if at least one of her 3-3's would get ratified, and she was close on her two attempts here, at least closer to fully rotating them than the jumps Alissa got downgraded on. So heck yeah, I'd say Caroline has a better chance of delivering the programs she did here (and also at National's) at World's, than Alissa has of doing two programs much better than she did here at 4CC.
10 pages of arguing boiled down to one paragraph.
(I agree with you, BTW)The job of the US Ladies going to the Worlds is to earn 13 points for the following all important National.
I do not think that a combo of Alissa and Rachael is impossible to earn 13 points.
It's certainly not impossible. However, given the results at 4CC (7th and 9th, respectively) it's not looking too good. Throw in the European ladies and at least Kostner will prevail. I mean, both skaters will have to put two solid programs down to even put themselves in such a position and we all know how likely that is, especially for Alyssa. Still though, if Meissner could win 2006 worlds, I guess I can't rule anything out...


