That would mean skaters would take much less risks and we would see easier programs.
And then people would complain about the lack of difficulty.
I agree. But quads are only so overvalued because everybody whined about them not being rewarded enough.
Well, you got what you wanted, people.
Why? I think quality should be rewarded over difficulty.
Isn't that exactly what raising triple GOE does?
No element could ever get +3 then, really. But I do agree judges should be more strict and not hand out those marks like candy.
You should consider everything and not just the landing.
I don't agree with this, the list is based on people's comments in this thread
Just because some errors are visible and others aren't doesn't make give them greater magnitude. And you should consider EVERYTHING when judging an element and not just the errors.
See answer for E
This way you are punishing the skaters twice. Elements are elements, presentation is presentation.
I also don't agree with this either, except this thread is full of people who only want clean skates to win (the list is according to the thread, Ziggy
Definitely. It means judges are marking as they expect others to mark and not what they see.
ITA
That would make the politics ten times worse. Do people really not understand that? It would create deals, tit for tat (you marked our skater low, you're screwed), etc.
Why?
I think that FS should probably carry a little more weight, yes.