- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
My question is: if the whole world already knows Patrick's skating leaves you cold, because you keep telling us over and over and over, why don't you just stop watching him or at least put on a sweater when you do?
It's still figure skating, not a jumping contest. Jin is getting good scores for what he's delivering and he's improving, but he's not a complete skater yet. And he isn't doing a triple loop (I hold that against him ).What a shame.
This is why mens figure skating is no longer a sport to me: Jin is way better than Patrick Chan. When you land 4 quad (including a quad Lutz) and 2 3A, even the gap in the artistry can't justify a defeat here.
Yuzuru, Patrick and Javier 's scores are becoming a little ridiculous at this point: they always earn some monstre scores even with a fall or a program not difficult enough to win.
It is like: Atletico Madrid beats Barcelona 5-1 but Barcelona wins because of the reputation. What?
What a shame.
This is why mens figure skating is no longer a sport to me: Jin is way better than Patrick Chan. When you land 4 quad (including a quad Lutz) and 2 3A, even the gap in the artistry can't justify a defeat here.
Yuzuru, Patrick and Javier 's scores are becoming a little ridiculous at this point: they always earn some monstre scores even with a fall or a program not difficult enough to win.
It is like: Atletico Madrid beats Barcelona 5-1 but Barcelona wins because of the reputation. What?
... Quite a few people went on to say that they were still not fans of Patrick after that skate, which is fine but doesn't indicate that their indifference was overcome. ...
What a shame.
This is why mens figure skating is no longer a sport to me: Jin is way better than Patrick Chan. When you land 4 quad (including a quad Lutz) and 2 3A, even the gap in the artistry can't justify a defeat here.
Yuzuru, Patrick and Javier 's scores are becoming a little ridiculous at this point: they always earn some monstre scores even with a fall or a program not difficult enough to win.
It is like: Atletico Madrid beats Barcelona 5-1 but Barcelona wins because of the reputation. What?
As I said above, my big-picture opinion is that the less negativity anywhere on GS, the better.
But I don't agree with the demonization in this thread of one particular phrase that does not strike me as particularly egregious.
And as someone whose views sometimes have been in the minority in other threads, I do not feel that it is inherently wrong for anyone to express a minority view.
I have found myself in the position of expressing a minority view -- with the intention of expressing it only once -- and then unexpectedly explaining it further in additional posts b/c multiple people give opposing replies to my first post.
... some people interjected this oft-repeated phrase in the middle of a stream of celebratory posts for Patrick, as if they were trying to pour cold water on it. ...
... There are those who think minority views ought to be bashed and stamped out, and then they ridicule the person with the minority view for being "defensive". ...
... We ought to be able to express support for a skater without being put on the defensive and having to explain ourselves with multiple additional posts. ...
Agree with you here.
So once again, I hope this post really will be my last one in this thread. [I know you had told me no need to reply -- it was my own choice to clarify.]
It's still figure skating, not a jumping contest. Jin is getting good scores for what he's delivering and he's improving, but he's not a complete skater yet. And he isn't doing a triple loop (I hold that against him ).
So I basically want to say (coming back to the soccer match): I think we have seen a different game.
If it doesn't make sense to you just look at the score sheet.I see a rough Patrick chan in the SP and clean in the LP against a clean Jin Boyang both in the SP and LP.
Patrick Chan wins. This doesn't make sense to me.
The technical side (that is not just jumps but also spins and steps sequence) of the competition shows what you are capable of, and if you do way way better than your opponent, the PCS shouldn't be so relevant.
In this case Patrick deserves win the FS, but overall Jin was way better here at the 4CC.
Patrick's 4T and 4T3T are biggest in this competition. Overall his jump quality is the most powerful here in this competition. :gclap:If it doesn't make sense to you just look at the score sheet.
Patrick only received about 23 points higher PCS, it should be more than that imo. It's true that his SP wasn't very good, but it wasn't exactly bad either. And Jin's spins and step sequence are only mediocre. So you can't say that Jin's better technically, because he isn't. He's the better quad jumper (because when you look at the jumps that both Jin and Chan do, Chan's are better) and Chan is better at everything else, spins, steps and choreographic sequence.
Sum it all up and you have Chan as the clear winner imho. In the end his lead is less than a point, I'm glad for it, because it should be more than that in my books.
I guess Chan's performance left me cold, too. After all, it took awhile for those chills and goosebumps to go away.
I guess Chan's performance left me cold, too. After all, it took awhile for those chills and goosebumps to go away.
I see a rough Patrick chan in the SP and clean in the LP against a clean Jin Boyang both in the SP and LP.
Patrick Chan wins. This doesn't make sense to me.
The technical side (that is not just jumps but also spins and steps sequence) of the competition shows what you are capable of, and if you do way way better than your opponent, the PCS shouldn't be so relevant.
In this case Patrick deserves win the FS, but overall Jin was way better here at the 4CC.
No skater however great, however perfect or talented or charming or artistic or brilliant can possibly please all the skating fans. A notoriously persnickety lot we are. If a skater can even appeal to a general majority of fans they can count themselves a rare success and forget the rest.