- Joined
- Apr 26, 2018
No, it is not. You're looking at it in a vacuum. I'll be repeating myself but oh well:If eu-sal is too much risk, than perhaps she’s not as technically advanced as some Russian novices, who do them routinely. That’s the point.
Let's look at Muravieva's goal at this JGP. Realistically, it wasn't necessarily to win at all costs but first and foremost to earn a second stage and the chance to qualify for the final. For this, you need (and have always needed) at least silver with a good score. Now, being in the lead after the SP and Petrosyan looking very rough in all practices, it was clear her best chance at this would be to skate as cleanly as possible. Especially since the judges seemed to appreciate her PCS quality the most in the SP - but that's an advantage you lose the minute you make mistakes. So, taking all this into consideration, the smartest and most sensible choice is to reduce risk of falling as best you can. And to do this, you create a layout with, ideally, minimal changes so as not to disrupt muscle memory, but also a BV close enough to your previous one. 3-3 combos are ALWAYS more risky than a 3-2-2, for EVERYONE. Even Kamila or Sasha or Anna.
So, knowing all this, WHY would you ever attempt a second 3-3 in the FS if you can get this close (remember, the difference is 0.30 points. 45.66 to 45.99!) without it? It's not about what she can or cannot do, or her level of consistency on 3-3 combos, it is about making the best strategic decision towards fulfilling your goal while minimising all possible risks. And frankly, it's a quality Plushenko was severely lacking in last season, so I was pleasantly surprised to see that he seemed to have learned at least something from all those disasters. (now watch me jinx this and have him go back to moronic decisions at the next comp lol)
That's the point: The risk of falling (or making other smaller mistakes) in a 3-3 combo is inherently higher than in a 3-2-2 combo, no matter your level, no matter your technical proficiency. So, if you're at a JGP event where you only want to place second and get a score as high as you can, you do not go all out if the potential reward is so small. You would, at the JGPF for example, or the Junior Nationals. But not here.
As for whether or not she deserved a second event, we'll have to agree to disagree here. We had four Russians here. She beat the scores of everyone but the girl with the three quads and she scored above one of the only potential qualifiers from other countries (Levito). Why not give her a second stage, especially if Petrosyan, who she beat here, already has one? And it's not like the assignments are set in stone either. If, miraculously, all five girls at JGP Russia beat Muravieva's scores, maybe we'll see them drop her. But as long as that doesn't happen.....

