Well, I very much doubt that in real life there would be 4F +4 GOE, and not 4F! with +1/+2. Sasha really had a weak external edge. This is easy to see, since the camera was shooting from the most convenient angle at the time of the jump.
Plus, there is UR on 4S. This is again not difficult to see, and even carefully studying the jump itself, it is clear that the reason is not a dense grouping in the initial phase of the jump.
So the "veteran" was too friendly. I think the correct score is 4-5 points lower. Which, of course, is still a huge score.