- Joined
- Mar 13, 2018
That was not better than the Japanese but what are you gonna do 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. It refers to an offer that is so far below the actual value of the object as to be insulting. The term may derive from a poker variant in which the lowest hand wins.Does the term not refer to male genitalia?
It's never the end of the discussion in figure skating. Quite clearly, she fell on his arm on the dismount, and they were given a 1.30+ The throw landing was okay as it was saved, but didn't deserve 1.89. Love them as you will. I enjoy watching them, but the huge rise in scores for them is, in part, political, with apparently most skating fans happily and lovingly on board. LOL!Just no. The Japanese team got their levels. The Americans didn't. End of discussion. And, I like both American teams and agree that they are sometimes underscored. But, the Japanese deserve to be in first. They were perfect.
They do come across a lot better live. I've seen their Bond programme, which I found super boring, but it looked much better live.I don't like mirrored step sequences... they look kinda awkward to me. Though I wonder if it actually look good live in person and just don't translate well on screen.
No haha. It means something significantly lower than it should be or is deserved haha.Does the term not refer to male genitalia?
Eh, nope...Does the term not refer to male genitalia?