- Joined
- Oct 22, 2019
Good people can you tell me why Yuma is tilting mid rotation sometimes? I adore him and his programs but it’s killing me with nervousness when he tilts in the air!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wasn't really suggesting she'd switchMy brain wouldn't let me sleep until I came back to say this: I dearly hope Alisa would never switch from pairs, because we would lose her absolutely gorgeous lift positions and throw landings. I don't thing she would anyway. And I think Misha is just an excellent pairs partner. Not showy, but this great presence and excellent pairs elements. The way he throws Alisa, for instance, matters.
www.skatingfinland.fi
I think it's mentally not being focused about where he should be in the air (he really should have good muscle memory from practice repetitions) or hurrying a bit (timing issue) in positioning that causes the tilts that lead to the falls or step outs....I know I'm probably not good at explaining it as a layperson...I can only wonder what Carolina and his Dad say to him about it...Good people can you tell me why Yuma is tilting mid rotation sometimes? I adore him and his programs but it’s killing me with nervousness when he tilts in the air!!!
I agree that Mone Chiba's Free Skating isn't perfect "yet" interpretation-wise; but what I'm wondering at, is how it can be that ready at all with the ugly cuts in it; yet she manages to make it one! Her interpretation is already awesome in spite of that sort of musical soup on which excelled another Sendai-born skater before her. Her scores reflect it, by the way. (And as I'm at it, Amber Glenn wasn't overscored in Components either, in spite of being American; she had very lenient jump calls but on the Components, nil; and it's not just Finlandia judges, as in both Mone Chiba's and Amber Glenn's previous Grand Prix, their American competitors were awarded higher Components, while deserving less; I'm saying overall, because I also know that a judge nowadays will give an overall Component score and share it randomly but narrowly between the three Component categories.)Mone Chiba has the best Long Program of the season but it makes me sad how much is missing still. She could be magical if there was more emphasis placed on truly expressing the music. Look at Sasha Cohen's R+J at the Olympics and how the program is allowed to breathe and emote midway through: the extension and slow glide forward after the layback, the delicacy of her arms that move as if she is trying to part the clouds, the way she stands at center ice and plucks a flower from the air, her sublime facial expressions. The amount of intimacy and longing and fated tragedy expressed in those moments is what skating NEEDS, and nobody is trying to do this anymore.
It's more than just that section of choreography, there are so many details that aren't as good. Look at Cohen's upward leg kick after her 3S. Chiba also does this in her program after her 3S and it's not as extended and impactful. It's in Chiba's program simply to show some kind of "extra movement", whereas in Cohen's program it's a stunning moment, a cinematic declaration, because of the shape she creates and how it goes with the music AND the overall choreographic concept of the whole program, doing it after the last jump at the end of the program, bringing to mind Juliet suddenly awaking, right before dying.
Similarly, Cohen's spins flow with the music better, the footwork sequence has a more clear shape and purpose, and of course the stunning spiral sequence. Chiba's spiral in her program, during the emotional climax of the music, is a bit clunky getting into the initial position, isn't held for especially long, and has a BENT KNEE. Yet because she's at least doing a spiral in that moment and it's not hideous, we're supposed to feel like something special is happening. In actuality it's merely the baseline of what a decent program should have and is quite far from being masterpiece level. The judging for a long time now has absolutely failed to correctly score the artistic merit of programs, and when you pair that with the horribly flawed rules, it turns programs into artificial collections of random turns/movements that don't add up to anything special, and the skaters are visibly focusing on those things while competing, instead of being IN the performance and caring about how to make it as attractive and emotional as possible.
Chiba's soft, fast glide and overall nice qualities allow her to get through the convoluted footwork sequence more elegantly than most other people, and she's able to create little moments of beauty in the program, but those moments are just glimmers of greatness, rather than actual greatness itself. Yet we cling to those moments and want her to win, because she's producing more of them than anyone else right now. In the current field, she displays the most amount of freedom and radiance. She's the least bogged down by the artifice of what skating has become.
I'm so glad she managed to finish the GP series this season on a high note and give her confidence going to nationals.
Cohen's legs were better positioned and utilized that anyone else these days. "double footed" skating means nothing with regards to artistic impact. Skating is an endeavor that requires two legs and is most beautiful when both legs, and the entire body, are displaying a great line or interesting shape. This has become lost in skating and needs to return. The body lines are constantly being broken, the shoulders hunched, legs bent or not extended, feet askew, the arms failing to be held in the most attractive way, head down and face failing to project to the audience. Lack of rhythm to the movement, lack of purpose.As to Sasha Cohen, while I agree that she gave us masterpieces of upper body interpretation, let's not forget her legs, her flat-edged, often double-footed skating which made the rest easier.
it wouldnt change anything if french judge gave 9,00 instead of 8,75
they got very nice score here 122.55 , I dont get you point , you behaving like they were underscored by all judges
I agree that her posture was gorgeous in general. Normally, posture is taken into account and how crossovers are skated, and I agree that it's very important. I also agree that judges don't take it into account when they overscore some skaters with poor or intermediate posture, or with crossovers neither hidden nor skated to the music (which would never have happened with Sasha Cohen). Also, the choice of steps fitting the program (musically and in meaning) is part of the Composition in its core. But packed random steps were more a feature of some early Eteri programs? They were to be rewarded in Skating Skills and partly in Transitions, but ought to have been penalised in Composition and often Interpretation? Do you agree with this video:Cohen's legs were better positioned and utilized that anyone else these days. "double footed" skating means nothing with regards to artistic impact. Skating is an endeavor that requires two legs and is most beautiful when both legs, and the entire body, are displaying a great line or interesting shape. This has become lost in skating and needs to return. The body lines are constantly being broken, the shoulders hunched, legs bent or not extended, feet askew, the arms failing to be held in the most attractive way, head down and face failing to project to the audience. Lack of rhythm to the movement, lack of purpose.
Beautiful crossovers that caress the ice and build tension and maintain flow are infinitely preferable to random turns that serve no purpose and actively make it impossible to hold a shape and create a clear picture. Anything someone does in a program should be performed because it looks good and follows the music. If something doesn't look good or doesn't serve any real purpose with the music, it should inherently be a PCS deduction. Judges are not actually looking at these details and deducting for deficiencies though. They don't even know what the deficiencies are in terms of real choreography.
that's not the point I am making. The point I am making is that it is possible to tinker with the scores even with the principle that outliers get thrown out. There is proof of it and history of it.
One cannot call out the officials accusing them of just keeping low levels to prop Chock and Bates up and then not call some other officials who did the same to prop FBC up in this event.
I am calling out ALL officials who play dirty.. not just selecting to fit my biases![]()
Do these ridiculously low scores affect the start orders at GPF? As we all know start orders tend to matter in judges scores.This is not true. Yes, the outliers are discarded. But this is exactly how it does matter. If some judges give on purpose very low scores, and they were judging other very highly, the average scores are shifted up or down. This is exactly how, for instance, a team can place a few tenths ahead in the rhythm dance, just like it happened here. 5 judges out of 9 placed Piper and Paul in first place for the RD...yet, FBC outscored them. It does matter. Every score matters, even the ones that get thrown away.
In principle, yes.Do these ridiculously low scores affect the start orders at GPF? As we all know start orders tend to matter in judges scores.
Is Finlandia cursed? It’s not that there are falls, it’s that they have so many freak falls. What’s going on at Finlandia?
Of course, there are no Russians competingI am complaining about all events.
I think it was about Andreas not Stephen.. and well, I'd like to know what a triple Euler is too.... I'd care to see a double evenGuys, did Mark say Stephen can jump triple Euler or did I hear that wrong? What on Earth is triple Euler??