- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
Good for them. I was rooting for the young champion of education for girls in Muslim countries, but the choice of the OPCW is quite compatible with the spirit of the original intent of the prize.
The funny thing is that no one knew that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (who?) existed until this crisis sprung up. The United Nations did a lot of hand-wringing and viewing-with-alarm, but nothing more. When the agreement emerged between Putin and Assad to let Russia become involved as a major player, all of a sudden someone remembered that there was already a multi-national group charged with the responsibility of enforcing the chemical weapons ban.
The Nobel committee hopes that this will inspire Russia and the United States, two signatories to the agreement to get rid of chemical stockpiles by 2012, to follow through on their promises. (I am not holding my breath.) I don’t know why the U.S. needs stores of chemical weapons anyway – if push come to shove we can always nuke 'em, we don’t have to gas ‘em, too.
I still maintain that Obama made out it pretty well, politically. When he was pressing for military action his approval rating with the American people dropped to 39%. Once that option was off the table it quickly climbed to 49%. Peace is better than war.
