- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
millie said:Dont forget that this is not the 6.0 system now and a skater hopefully will not be held up.
I guess you missed Worlds and the generous scoring of top skaters at Campbells and past GP's.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
millie said:Dont forget that this is not the 6.0 system now and a skater hopefully will not be held up.
I guess you missed Worlds and the generous scoring of top skaters at Campbells and past GP's.millie said:Don't count your chickens before they hatch, you might be disappointed. If Sasha or anybody else gets the major title, good for them--I hope that whoever gets, gets it fair and square--not given to them like under the old 6.0.
Red Dog said:I only know of ONE instance where she spoke about something even related to this. Care to provide a link to the article where she says these things? Because I sure missed it...![]()
bdreampixie said:![]()
I guess you missed Worlds and the generous scoring of top skaters at Campbells and past GP's.

Bijoux said:Irina won because of her jumps, energy and Sasha's mistakes. I agree the politics are still there and CoP or no CoP, a Rusian sweep seems likely this year.
QUOTE]
While i half agree with this i would also add that Irina won because her very serious flaws in the SP were totally overlooked compared to how they would have left her under 6.0. Had it been marked under 6.0 she would have had at least a 0.6 deduction on technical merit and i think there's an easy argument to say 0.7 mandatory deduction given the landing of the combination jump.
Ant
Red Dog said:I don't think she's "mastered" Cop (she's only competed ONCE under it) but I agree wholeheartedly with you- Kwan is already our 2006 US National champion (unless she pulls out). Kwan better be competitive (and Cohen too) because they've had all this rest. .
Red Dog said:millie- If you doubt me, just you wait.![]()
(On the other hand, if Cohen manages to shock us, I'll gladly "eat crow" or whatever you call it. But I made the same statement last year, and I was right on.)
Red Dog said:Here's a BIG question.
Nats this year is using Cop for the first time.
Kwan has only competed under this system ONCE. But Cohen, even with her bare program and mistakes last year was able to place above her.
So- does the advantage suddenly switch this time around? Is it now Cohen that has the edge? Does Kwan lose that "sentimental" edge she has had in the mathematics? Or will the US judges be biased towards Kwan and their sentimental feelings and give it to her instead?
In a close one, it's going to MK. IMO Cohen would really have to OUTSKATE Kwan in BOTH the SP and the FS to have a chance at winning.
I think it's all about the judges. Will these US Nationals judges be like international judges and look at Kwan as very inexperienced with the system? Hmm...some food for thought. I tend to think it will be the same, though, and Kwan will get that "jolt" once she crosses borders- kind of like 04 and 05. The US judges don't exactly have a short history of giving excellent feedback anyway- at least I don't think so.
bdreampixie said:![]()
I guess you missed Worlds and the generous scoring of top skaters at Campbells and past GP's.
kyla2 said:I think the judging at Nationals has been consistent and fair. I absolutely believe that the judges will give it to whoever deserves it. I firmly believe that if Sasha skates a great program, she could get the nod over Michelle. I also believe Michelle has a very CoP competitive program this year. It really comes down to who delivers, the night of the LP. They will be 1 and 2 going into the LP because their closest competition isn't even close.
antmanb said:...but really you have to question how good TT is if she choreographed a program for Weir both this year and last year that doesn't use up all 8 jumping passes.
Ant
antmanb said:Sorry but i don't understand how you can believe that Kwan has a very CoP competitive program...the only way to believe this (aside from blind faith, and even this kwan fan has enough of a grip on reality to not go that far) is to have seen her compete her program in front of CoP trained judges and seeing the feedback. I agree that TT is a good choice in terms of choreography for CoP (though not nearly as good as David Wilson) but really you have to question how good TT is if she choreographed a program for Weir both this year and last year that doesn't use up all 8 jumping passes.
Ant

emma said:Is it really possible that TT just decided on her own not to include 8 passes...or is it likely that Weir and coach wanted it that way? Anyone who knows how programs are made and/or anything about team Weir haven any idea?
f you're prediction was just kwan to win, then you did get it right. If your prediction was the US will hand her the title then i think you were wrong. Kwan won the title - the ridiculous 6s are a different story, but winning the title convincingly she did.
It would be intriguing if, for whatever reason, Michelle decided not to compete at the Olympics after all. There would be a big scramble within the U.S. Olympic hype machine to transfer the "America's sweetheart" role over to Sasha.
For two reasons: 1. to use their judgement by following the guidelines that are there to ensure the correct weight of each aspect of skating, instead of overinflating and overemphasizing a specific aspect of the skate and 2. to make performances over different competitions comparable, which doesn't work if #1 doesn't happen. There's a reason for each element's and each component scores value.Mathman said:About Irina's performance at Worlds, I don't really have any objection to the judges saying to themselves, wow, that was a great show, let's pile on the points for transitions, choreography, etc. Maybe this defeats the purpose of the CoP, but the judges have to be allowed to do something toward determining the winner, otherwise why are they sitting there?