Japanese Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Reactors | Page 11 | Golden Skate

Japanese Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Reactors

9 PM March 28 TEPCO Report

All air measurements still trending slowly down.

Daina 9 PM March 28th 6.3 microSieverts/Hour
Daiichi 9 PM March 28th West Gate 120.0 microSieverts/Hour Wind in the west again
Daiichi 9 PM March 28th Main Gate 190.0 microSieverts/Hour
Daiichi 9 PM March 28th Main Building 1.7 milliSieverts/Hour


All three workers who stepped in the contaminated water left the hospital.


I'm so glad to see this confirmed!

Unit 3
-We had been injecting fresh water in to the reactor utilizing fire pump, however, we switched over to utilizing temporary electrical pump from 8:30 pm on March 28th.
(Unit 2 was switched over on March 27 6:31 PM)



March 28, air results Daina

Things have been essentially flat, species by species, since March 19th, with a spike somewhere between 3/26 and 3/27.

http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu11_e/images/110328e13.pdf
However, everything is down today, particularly, Iodine 131 is down today, as is Cesium 137, the most common and dangerous radionuclides.

March 28, air results, Daiichi
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/betu11_e/images/110328e12.pdf

Lower now than on the 25th.

Soil monitoring at Daiichi (this is new). The language is a little cryptic, but when you check out the data, its quite good news. There is very little elevation of Plutonium in Daiichi soil over past Japanese Plutonium results (Plutonium has a very long half life. Plutonium from the bomb at Nagasaki and from fallout from the 1950's and 1960's nuclear tests all over the world are all over the world.

‹Results of the analysis›
-Plutonium was detected in the soil of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.
-The density of detected plutonium is equivalent to the fallout observed in Japan when the atmospheric nuclear test was conducted in the past.
-The detected plutonium from two samples out of five may be the direct result of the recent incident, considering their activity ratio of the plutonium isotopes.
-The density of detected plutonium is equivalent to the density in the soil under normal environmental conditions and therefore poses no major impact on human health. TEPCO strengthens environment monitoring inside the station and surrounding areas.
-We will conduct analysis of the three additional soil samples.

Units: Becquerel per kilogram in soil (Samples taken on March 21st & 22nd)
Normal Japanese Domestic Soil 1978 to 2008 - Plutonium 238 0.15 Bq/kg,
Normal Japanese Domestic Soil 1978 to 2008 - Plutonium 239 & Plutonium 245 4.5 Bq/kg
At Daiichi Plutonium 238 samples range 0.15 to 0.54 Bq/kg
At Daiichi Plutonium 239 and Plutonium 240 range 0.26 to 1.2 Bq/kg
 
NEI's 1:30 PM Eastern Standard Time Report

Seawater values are down too.

So why is MSNBC predicting global disaster again? I get so tired of the media.

NEI seems to be taking the word "trenches" differently than the NHK translation, which was clearly piping chases.

UPDATE AS OF 11:30 A.M. EDT, MONDAY, MARCH 28:
Radiation levels in the seawater near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant remained high on Monday, but dropped considerably from the levels reported on Sunday. Monday's sampling near the plant's south discharge outlet showed that radioactive iodine levels were 250 times normal, reduced significantly from 1,850 times normal.

Radiation dose rates also remained elevated in the turbine buildings of reactors 1, 2, 3 and 4. Tokyo Electric Power Co. on Monday said that workers had found similarly high radiation levels in water in drainage conduits outside reactors 1 and 2. The company said that rubble at reactor 3 prevented measures from being taken there on Monday.

TEPCO is pumping contaminated water from the basement of the turbine building at reactors 1 and 2 to the main condenser. The company also continued to pump fresh water into reactors 1, 2 and 3, using electrical-driven pumps rather than diesel-powered fire pumps.

Levels of radiation at the plant's main gate ranged from 12.5 millirems per hour to about 20 millirem per hour. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's annual limit for occupational exposure is 5,000 millirem.
 
So why is MSNBC predicting global disaster again? I get so tired of the media.

same reason they freak out about the global warming happening in Alaska, even though it's all part of a cycle that I've seen happen in my 26.5 years of life here in AK... because it sells.
 
There is actually some science behind global warming, and its something that a lot of respectable scientists believe in. The really weak part of the model is the part where they need to really believe their weather data for the Middle Ages.

And you can't interpret every snowstorm as not warm, or every melt as warming, which is what the media does, which is what any weather scientist will tell you, and then the media will shut him right up.

A really good discussion of the global warming data (the real stuff) by the guy who actually measures it (including tell you what stuff is not proven, can be found here:

A really good general talk by Dr. David Long of Brigham Young University, on observing global warming via microwave scatterometry, geared to the general public, may be viewed at the following address:
http://www.byub.org/talks/Talk.aspx?id=2994


The ice cap definitely hasn't melted since the Age of Exploration in North America-if it had, some of those guys searching for the Northwest passage would have found it ;)

And the glaciers and ice fields melting in Greenland are changing at a rapid, rapid rate.

You can't dump CO2 into the air forever and expect nothing to change. Or for that matter, methane.

The questions are:

1. What are the compensating responses?

One of them that I expected, and have seen, though I haven't seen it mentioned by the media or the scientists, is increased vulcanism and increased earthquakes--because if the ice cap has significantly changed in size in a relatively rapid time, chances are, things are going to be moving around. The earth's surface is just plates floating on a molten core of rock, like dumplings floating over the top of the stew-Take out a dumpling and turn the heat up so its boiling and those dumplings will start moving around.

We have had a large number of severe volcanoes in the last couple years. All that dust in the upper air produces global cooling.

2. What can we do about it that would be smart to do?

For example, whether there is global warming or not, it would be smart not to be too dependent on Middle Eastern Oil.

It also is not nice to kill off 24,000 people a year in the US due to coal-fired electricity plants, whether there is global warming or not.
 
NEI reports on the negligible amount of plutonium, and the fact that a conference will be held this summer by the IAEA to see what lessons on nuclear safety we can learn from the Japanese experiences at Daina & Daiichi. I think that's a great idea, particularly the part about doing it soon enough, while everything is clear in everyone's mind.

UPDATE AS OF 1:30 P.M. EDT, MONDAY, MARCH 28:
Tokyo Electric Power Co. has detected isolated, low concentrations of plutonium in the soil at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. The density of plutonium is equivalent to the fallout that reached Japan from nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War, the company said.

TEPCO conducted analysis of plutonium contained in the soil collected on March 21 and 22 at five locations at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. Plutonium 238, 239 and 240 were detected, however just two of the samples may be the direct result of the recent incident, considering the ratio of the plutonium isotopes.

"The density detected in the plutonium is equivalent to the density in the soil under normal environmental conditions and therefore poses no major impact on human health," TEPCO said. The company said it plans to strengthen environmental monitoring inside the station and surrounding areas.

The International Atomic Energy Agency today said it plans to conduct a high-level conference on nuclear safety "before the summer." IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said it is "vitally important that we learn the right lessons from what happened on March 11, and afterwards, in order to strengthen nuclear safety throughout the world."

Amano said the conference should cover: an initial assessment of the Fukushima accident, its impact and consequences; lessons learned for the industry; strengthening nuclear safety; and strengthening the response to nuclear accidents and emergencies.
 
IAEA status for March 28

The Unit 1 turbine building was pumped out and the The Unit 1 Reactor will be on on temporary pumps run by offsite power tomorrow.


On Monday, 28 March 2011, Graham Andrew, Special Adviser to the IAEA Director General on Scientific and Technical Affairs, provided the following briefing on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan:

1. Current Situation

An earthquake of magnitude 6.5 occurred at 22:23 UTC on 27 March near the east coast of Honshu. NISA has confirmed that there have been no abnormal radiation readings at the Onagawa nuclear power plant, the closest to the epicentre, whose three units remain in cold shutdown since the earthquake of 11 March. As of 02:30 UTC today, there were no reports of any problems at nuclear plants in Japan related to the latest seismic event.

Overall at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, the situation is still very serious.

NISA informed the IEC that a meeting is planned with TEPCO to determine the origin and path of water in the turbine buildings of Units 1 to 4. As seen with the contaminated workers, high dose rates in the turbine buildings and contaminated water in the basements can hamper recovery efforts.

The pumping of contaminated water from the basement floor of Unit 1's turbine building into its main condenser is in progress, whereas at Unit 2 that process has not begun because the steam condenser is full. At Unit 3, the pumping of contaminated water and in particular where it is going, are under consideration. The issue is also being examined for Unit 4.

Temperatures measured at the feed water nozzle and at the bottom of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) continue to decrease slightly at Units 1 and 2, except the temperature at the feed water nozzle of Unit 1's RPV, which has slightly increased to 274 °C.

A positive development is that the pumping of fresh water into the reactor pressure vessel of Unit 1 is to switch from the use of fire trucks to temporary electrical pumps running on offsite power on 29 March. At Unit 2, this switch was carried out on 27 March, with a diesel generator as backup in case offsite power is interrupted. Fresh water is also being injected continuously into the reactor pressure vessel of Unit 3, albeit currently pumped by fire trucks. The switch to temporary electrical pumps for this unit is planned for today.


On 27 March at Unit 3, water was sprayed into the spent fuel pool using a concrete pump truck, and seawater was also pumped in through the spent fuel cooling system. It is planned to start pumping fresh water into the spent fuel pool tomorrow.

It is also planned to commence pumping freshwater into the spent fuel pool of Unit 4 from tomorrow.

Units 5 and 6 remain in cold shutdown.

At noon today in Japan, the three workers mentioned in previous briefings were released from the National Institute of Radiological Sciences where they had been kept under observation. The result of analyses performed indicates that the level of localised exposure received by two of them is between 2,000 and 3,000 millisievert (i.e. somewhat lower than the previous estimate of 2,000 to 6,000 millisievert).


2. Radiation Monitoring


On 27 March, deposition of iodine-131 was detected in 9 prefectures, and deposition of cesium-137 in 4 prefectures. The highest values were observed in the prefecture of Tochigi with 320 becquerel per square metre for iodine-131 and 73 becquerel per square metre for caesium-137. In the other prefectures where deposition of iodine-131 was reported, on 27 March, the range was from 6.4 to 110 becquerel per square metre. For caesium-137, the range was from 16 to 61 becquerel per square metre. In the Shinjyuku district of Tokyo, the daily deposition of iodine-131 on 27 March was 100 becquerel per square metre, while for caesium-137 it was 36 becquerel per square metre. No significant changes were reported in the 45 prefectures in gamma dose rates compared to yesterday.

Two IAEA teams are currently monitoring radiation levels and radioactivity in the environment in Japan. One team made gamma dose-rate measurements in the Tokyo and Chiba region at 3 locations. Gamma-dose rates measured ranged from 0.08 to 0.13 microsievert per hour, which is within or slightly above the background. The second team made additional measurements at distances of 30 to 46 km from the Fukushima nuclear power plant. At these locations, the dose rates ranged from 0.5 to 3 microsievert per hour. At the same locations, results of beta-gamma contamination measurements ranged from 0.02 to 0.3 Megabecquerel per square metre.

New results from the marine monitoring stations 30 km off-shore were received for seawater samples taken on 26 March. The levels decreased at most of the locations. For iodine-131 the concentration results for four monitoring stations are between 6 to 18 becquerel per litre, and for caesium-137 between �below limit of detection� and 16 becquerel per litre. The dose rates measured on the sea surface remain relatively low between 0.04 and 0.1 microsievert per hour.

Samples collected on 26 March 330 metres east of the discharge point showed increasing concentrations. There were found to be 74,000 becquerel per litre for iodine-131, 12,000 becquerel per litre for caesium-137, and 12,000 becquerel per litre for caesium-134.

It is still too early to draw conclusions for expected concentrations in marine food, because the situation can change rapidly. Modelling results show an initial north-eastern transport of liquid releases from the damaged reactors.

Monitoring of iodine-131 and cesium-137 in drinking water is on-going. Iodine-131 has been monitored by the Japanese authorities in 2 of 10 samples taken in the Fukushima prefecture with values of 60 and 90 becquerel per litre. In the Ibaraki prefectures, iodine-131 was detected in 2 of 9 samples, the values were 40 and 90 becquerel per litre. The Japanese limits for the ingestion of drinking water by infants is 100 becquerel per litre.

As far as food contamination is concerned, samples reported from 26 to 27 March in six prefectures (Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Niigata, Tochigi and Yamagata) reported iodine-131 in asparagus, cabbage, celery, chive, cucumber, eggplant, leek, mushrooms, parsley, tomato, spinach and other leafy vegetables, strawberries and watermelon. One sample of hana wasabi taken on 24 March in Fukushima prefecture was above the regulation values set by the Japanese authorities. Caesium-137 was also measured above the regulation value in the same sample of hana wasabi, but in the remaining five prefectures, caesium-137 was not detected or the results were below regulation values.

The Joint FAO/IAEA Food Safety Assessment Team met with local government authorities in Fukushima on Sunday and discussed issues related to food contamination, including standards and sampling plan designs for radionuclides in food and the environment, radionuclide transfer from soil to plants, and mitigation strategies. The FAO/IAEA team also met with the local authority in Ibaraki prefecture today. They will have meetings with local government officials in Tochigi and Gunma tomorrow.
 
An odd news report from France says that TEPCO has requested aid from Areva, the French nuclear company, owned by the state. What that aid would be has not been stated. Areva already sent a lot of monitoring eqipment and a sizable monetary donation to the Japanese government. However, Areva has a ship rigged for picking up nuclear spent fuel to go to its reprocessing plant. If some of the older spent fuel could be removed from Units 5 & 6's spent fuel pool, perhaps some rods from 2 through 4 could be moved there, where they could be cooled effectively, and reducing the problems with the other pools.

GE, who built 3 of the reactors at Daiichi, has published a description of how the Mark 1 containment works:

http://www.gereports.com/setting-the-record-straight-on-mark-i-containment-history/

and a different drawing of the type of reactor that Unit 1 & Unit 2 are:

http://files.gereports.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/containment-lg.jpg


All of the modifications were made in accordance with regulatory requirements. In the United States, for example, the NRC issued a generic industry requirement in 1980 for the Mark I containment that the industry used to make modifications.

We understand that all of the BWR Mark I containment units at Fukushima Daiichi also addressed these issues and implemented modifications in accordance with Japanese regulatory requirements.

The modifications made to Mark I containments include:

•“Quenchers” were installed to distribute the steam bubbles in order to produce rapid condensation and to reduce loads on the unit. In a reactor, exhaust steam is piped into a suppression chamber, which is known as the torus and is a large, rounded suppression pool that sits next to the reactor core. It is used to remove heat when large quantities of steam are released from the reactor. In the torus, the steam bubbles go under water. With the modification to the Mark I, the quenchers, which are also underwater, make steam bubbles smaller by breaking up the larger bubbles. This in turn reduces pressure.


•Another modification is the installation of deflectors inside the torus. When that steam goes in, the water level rises. The deflectors that were added break up the pressure wave that is produced and help relieve pressure on the torus.


•A further modification was made to the “saddles” on which the torus sits — basically the series of leg-like structures that support it. The construction was fortified, as was the steel, to accommodate the loads that are generated.


Another interesting resource is your local nuclear plant's safety manual.

Here's mine:

http://www.dom.com/about/stations/nuclear/millstone/pdf/millstone_guidebook.pdf
 
Thanks, Doris. Interesting about the French company. Clearly the people involved are thinking outside the box.
 
I'm not saying Global Warming is a farce, but the reports with the hyperbole is what gets me. Yes hundreds of Caribou died in a certain region last winter - the national news say it "could" be caused by global warming. Gee, really? thought it was teh poachers that went and blasted them during a drunken party (no joke, global warming was blamed by some outside news outlets for the incident, it was pretty pathetic).

And don't get me started on how ill informed people are about ANWR's size vs where the Oil would be drilled. Not going into the politics of whether it's right or wrong, but the way the media portrays it (and those that are anti opening it) IS wrong no matter how you look at it.
 
Yes, I totally agree.

For that matter, when we got down to Englewood, FL, this winter (it's on the Gulf Coast of Florida), somehow I expected to see tar balls on the beach, at least on the Gulf beaches rather than the Intercoastal beaches, from the huge British Petroleum oil spill we had last summer. No tar balls. And there are no tar balls at Panama City, where Ski's uncle lives. Tourism in Florida, especially in the early part of the year was way down because people thought the Florida Gulf Coast was layered in oil. (so taking that with a grain of salt, I was expecting at least tar balls, which is what you get when the oil ages.) It's nasty to get off your legs, and you did get it on beachese north of Boca Raton on the east coast from some oil spill long ago.

It's not that it wasn't a real, huge environmental disaster, it was, but the media couldn't just report that; they had to make it more than it was, as far as the area covered. They were declaring the fishing industry in Apalachicola (oysters, & etc) as doomed for decades.

Some of the problem is creating a huge fuss in the media, and then reporting on how upset people feel, but they are upset due to the fuss (like this article):

http://www.tampabay.com/features/humaninterest/article1103305.ece

It appears the oysters are still fine.

http://www.wakulla.com/Community_Bl...r_on_Florida's_Forgotten_Coast_2011032711765/

Even the Apalachicola branch of Riverkeeper, an environmental group, who will be listening to a talk on the BP spill this month, are still holding their annual Apalachicola oyster cookoff and paddle trip.

http://oysterradio.blogspot.com/2011/03/apalachicola-riverkeeper-annual_23.html

And the fishing areas there are open:

http://shellfish.floridaaquaculture.com/seas/seas_centralgulf.htm

And although it's getting late in the season for Panama City, fishing is open there too. They eat the oysters raw. No one is complaing about oil in the oysters, it seems:

http://shellfish.floridaaquaculture.com/seas/seas_westgulf.htm
 
Back to Japan, the NEI had a report after I went to bed last night,

And did I tell you we would be doing picocuries soon? Well, we are. However, before you get upset about 432 picocuries in some cases, it's good to know what one is::

( One picocurie per liter is one-trillionth of a curie per liter.) Did I not tell you we would be having picocuries reported soon? A picocurie is basically a half whiff of nothing, but its correct definition is: A picocurie is one trillionith of a curie, and represents about 2.2 counts per minute. A curie is approximately the counts you would get from a gram of radium. And radium weighs about 5.5 grams per cubic centimeter, so a gram occupies 0.18 cubic centimeters. A liter on the other hand, is 1000 cubic centimeters. In radiation, you can basically find a single atom, if it is there, and decays while you are watching. For comparison, a Becquerel is a count per second.]

Now, radium is nasty stuff. Marie Curie died, eventually from handling it, but she handled a lot more than one curie. Radium occurs naturally in coal, and in granite, decaying to produce radon gas. And the radium and radon in coal smoke is one of the major contributers to the east coast's level of background radiation.

Radium was painted on watch dials by ladies who used to lick their paintbrushes to point them up, and so were studied as a cohort for effects of radiation, and the watch dial ladies definitely had health effects. However, in 2006, the last of the watch dial painters celebrated her one hundredth birthday. Needless to say, they were next to a lot more than one picocurie of radiation in a day's work.

On the other hand, the two of workers (the ones who didn't wear boots) who were released from the hospital had a really severe does of radiation of 200 to 300 rem. 400 to 500 rem is the dose, where if it was distributed over the whole of the body would cause half the people who are exposed to it to die, and is termed a "Lethal Dose." The worker who had boots will not have had nearly as much, since most of the radioactive materials in the water are beta emitters, and a pair of boots stops beta particles.

Anyway, back to the NEI report:

UPDATE AS OF 7 P.M. EDT, MONDAY, MARCH 28:
The International Atomic Energy Agency said that Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency is planning a meeting with Tokyo Electric Power Co. to determine the origin of contaminated water in the turbine buildings at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

Contaminated water from the basement floor of the reactor 1 turbine building is being pumped into its main condenser. At reactor 2 that process has not begun because the steam condenser is full, IAEA said. Pumping contaminated water is being considered at reactors 3 and 4.

Three workers who received radiation exposure from standing in contaminated water were released today from the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, where they had been under observation. The level of localized exposure received by two of the workers is between 200 to 300 rem, lower than the previous estimate of 200 to 600 rem, IAEA said.

Radiation Monitoring Continues
Results from ocean monitoring stations up to 18 miles off the shoreline from the Fukushima Daiichi plant showed levels of iodine-131 at most locations were below federal limits. IAEA said results from four monitoring stations on March 26 showed iodine-131 concentrations were between 162 and 486 picocuries per liter. Cesium-137 concentrations ranged from below the level of detection up to 432 picocuries per liter.

IAEA said that it is still too early to draw conclusions for expected concentrations in marine food, because the situation can change rapidly.

The latest sampling shows that drinking water in Fukushima and Ibaraki prefectures remain below the Japanese limits for the ingestion of drinking water by infants. Iodine-131 was reported in food samples taken from March 26 to March 27 in six prefectures (Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Niigata, Tochigi and Yamagata) in vegetables, strawberries and watermelon.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency identified trace amounts of radioactive isotopes at its 12 RadNet air monitor locations across the nation. The levels are extremely low and are far below levels that would be a public health concern. EPA's samples were captured by monitors in Alaska, Alabama, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada and Washington state over the past week and sent to EPA scientists for detailed laboratory analysis.

For more information about radiation, see NEI's Web page on health and radiation safety. For detailed information on EPA's RadNet air monitor locations, click here.

New Videos
NEI has uploaded two more videos to its YouTube channel. The first video discusses the design and safe operation of a nuclear reactor and the second video discusses dry cask storage for spent fuel at nuclear energy plants. Both videos feature Everett Redmond, NEI's director of nonproliferation and fuel cycle policy.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile at TEPCO:

Daina, March 29th, 9:00 AM, Measurement Point 4, 6.3 microSieverts per hour.
Daiichi, March 29th, 9:00 AM, West Gate 137.8 microSieverts per hour (up, and wind is back in the east)
Daiichi, March 29th, 9:00 AM, Main Gate 180 microSieverts per hour (down)
Daiichi, March 29th, 9:00 AM, Main Building 1.2 milliSieverts per hour (up and bouncing around)

At Unit 1: (Now Units 1, 2, and 3 reactors are on temporary electrical pumps, rather than fire engines)
At 8:20 am on March 29th, we switched injection of fresh water from using fire engine to temporary electrical pump.


TEPCO reports its plutonium study in its main status report for 9 am. (Plutonium is very long lived, and is still on the ground from Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the atmospheric nuclear tests. You would also find some of it on the ground in the US, especially, I would suspect in Nevada.)

*Plutonium has detected from the sample of soil at the site of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station collected on 21st and 22nd of March, Concentration level of Plutonium detected was same as that of under usual environment and it is thought not to be harmful to human health. We will strengthen environmental monitoring of power station and surrounding environment.
 
JAIF has up the translated version of the noon news for March 29th from NHK:

More information on what the trenches are, and that they do not extend to the sea.

NHK is labelling Unit 2's reactor as the ultimate source of the water, but while an educated guess, it is not wholly confirmed yet.


Today’s NHK news regarding status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power
station as of 12:00 on March 29
●Tokyo Electric Power Company says plutonium has been found in soil samples from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.It says the radioactive substance appears to be related to the ongoing nuclear accident, but the level detected is the same as that found in other parts of
Japan and does not pose a threat to human health. TEPCO collected samples from 5 locations around the power plant over 2 days from March 21st and found 2 samples contaminated with plutonium. Plutonium is a byproduct of the nuclear power generation process. At the number 3 reactor of the Fukushima plant, plutonium is an ingredient in mixed oxide, or MOX, fuel.
Radioactivity from plutonium can be shielded by a sheet of paper. But it can remain in lungs and other organs to cause long-term damages including cancer. The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says the detected level is the same as that found in the environment and not health-threatening for workers who conducted the sampling, nor residents in surrounding areas.
The agency said it is awaiting the results of another survey by the Science Ministry outside of a 20-kilometer radius from the plant, as well as a further survey by TEPCO in the plant compound.

●TEPCO faces challenge in cooling reactor The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said on Monday that TEPCO has to strike a balance between injecting cooling water into the reactors and
preventing radioactive water from seeping out. On Monday, the power company detected radiation of more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour on the surface of puddles in the No. 2 reactor's turbine
building and in a trench outside the building. The concrete trench stretches toward the coast but does not connect to the sea. Puddles of water were also found in the trenches of the No.1 and No.3 reactors.

The No.1 reactor's trench will overflow if the water rises by 10 centimeters. TEPCO has blocked the trench outlet with sandbags and concrete to prevent the water from reaching the ocean.
The water in the trenches of the No.2 and No.3 reactors is reportedly 1 meter from overflowing.

We have been reporting a status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station by summarizing news aired by NHK, which is Japanese national broadcasting company. We regard it as most credible news among many news sources and I am happy to say that NHK’s English website has gotten enriched and you can see movies and English scripts at
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/society.html.

Given this situation, we decide to simply place these scripts as it is for the record in case that it will be deleted later, rather than summarizing news as we did. TEPCO said it hopes to swiftly find a way to remove the water from the trenches.

On Monday, The power company scaled back its operation to cool the No. 2 reactor, injecting 7 tons per hour, reduced from 16. The reactor's temperature rose by more than 20 degrees Celsius.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011 08:03 +0900 (JST)


●Radioactive water in external tunnels
The operator of the damaged nuclear power plant in Fukushima, northeastern Japan, has reported that very high levels of radiation have been observed in water in a trench just outside the turbine building for one of the reactors. Tokyo Electric Power Company announced on Monday that a puddle of water was found in a trench outside the No. 2 reactor turbine building at the Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear plant on Sunday afternoon. It said the radiation reading on the puddle's surface indicated more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour. The concrete trench is 4 meters high and 3 meters wide and houses power cables and pipes. It is located in the compound of the plant but outside the radiation control area. TEPCO says the trench extends 76 meters toward the sea but does not reach the sea, and that the contaminated water was not flowing into the sea. TEPCO says it is trying to find out how the contaminated water came to be in the trench.

Radiation levels of more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour were recorded on Sunday in a puddle of water in the basement of the No. 2 reactor turbine building. Puddles of water were also found in the trenches outside the No. 1 and No. 3 reactors. TEPCO reported 0.4 millisieverts of radiation on the surface of the puddle in the No. 1 reactor's trench. But it said it failed to measure the No. 3 reactor's trench because it was covered with debris.

TEPCO says it had no intention of concealing data regarding the high level of radiation detected on Sunday outside a turbine building at its Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.

TEPCO Vice President Sakae Muto said at a news conference on Monday that he only received the report from the plant workers earlier in the day.The plant operator has revealed that it found water in a covered tunnel outside the turbine building of the number 2 reactor, and that radiation of more than 1,000 millisieverts per hour was detected in the water. Muto said the company has made this public and instructed the plant workers to quickly take steps to dispose of the water.
Asked by reporters if TEPCO was concealing information, Muto said the company has no intention of doing so.

He also said every day is full of events, and that TEPCO will quickly share information of high importance so that it can swiftly consider countermeasures. Vice President Muto added that the plant operator will confirm the flow of information and have it thoroughly implemented in order to avoid misunderstandings.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011 02:21 +0900 (JST)

●Radiation hampers cooling efforts The effort to cool reactors at the damaged nuclear power plant in Fukushima, northern Japan, is facing the risk of leaking highly radioactive substances.
The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company, raised water pumping power on Sunday to cool the No. 2 reactor in a stable manner. On Monday, the company cut back on the amount of injected water. The move followed the Nuclear Safety Commission's announcement that highly
radioactive substances detected in puddles of water in the basement of the reactor's turbine building may have come directly from the vessel containing the reactor. 16 tons of water was being injected into the reactor every hour but TEPCO now says it wants to reduce the amount to 7 tons. This would be enough to replace the amount that is evaporating. If the injected water level is reduced, temperatures may increase in the reactor. TEPCO announced on Monday that radioactive substances 100,000 times higher than usual for water in a reactor core were detected in puddles in the No. 2 reactor's turbine building on Sunday. High radiation figures were also recorded earlier in water in the basements of the turbine buildings for the No. 1 and No. 3 reactors. On Thursday, 3 workers were exposed to high radiation while working in water at the No. 3 reactor's turbine building. The Nuclear Safety Commission said on Monday that the concentration of radiation at the No. 2 reactor was dozens of times higher than the other 2 reactors. The commission said it assumes that radioactive substances from temporarily melted fuel rods at the No. 2 reactor had made their way into water in the reactor containment vessel and then leaked out through an unknown route. TEPCO, later, reported that very high levels of radiation have also been observed in water in a trench just outside the turbine building for one of the reactors. The commission said the biggest concern is the possibility of highly radioactive
water seeping into the ground and the ocean. It added that all-out efforts should be made to prevent contaminated water from leaking and called on the government to intensify monitoring radiation levels in the ground water and seawater.
Monday, March 28, 2011 22:38 +0900 (JST)

JAIF Status updates:

iation dose higher than 1000 mSv was maeaured at the surface of water accumulated in the tunnel for laying piping outside turbine building on Mar. 28th. Plutonium was detected from the soil of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS site on Mar. 28th. The concentration of the plutonium is as little as one measured in Japan when the nuclear bomb tests were conducted in the atmosphere in the past.

Removing water with high concentration of radioactive nuclides in the buildings of Unit 1through 3 was partly begun on 26th but is considered to take time to complete.
 
Last edited:
TEPCO had more going on today:

No blackouts planned for March 30th
Blackouts for March 31st TBD, no more than 3 hours to any customer.


March 29, 2011
Daina Measuring Point Four 3:00 PM 6.2 microSieverts/hour (same or lower)
Daiichi West Gate 3:00 PM 116 microSieverts/hour, wind south southeast at 1.5 meters per second (toward Daini) (lower)

Seawater Data
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11032906-e.html
Now the south canal is lower and the north canal is higher. Data for Iodine 131 at Iwasawa shore ( Daini) is a bit higher than yesterday, I think. (3.8 Bq/cubic centimeter)

If you look at a map
Page 6 in this file
http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1301399277P.pdf

You will see that Daina is south of Daiichi

So these measurements go, north to south:

Daiichi North Canal
Daiichi South Canal
Daini North Discharge Canal
Daini Shore

Anyway Air Measurements
Western Gate Daiichi (Iodine 131 and Cesium 137 down since yesterday) Isotopes of Iodine, Cesium and Cobalt
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11032907-e.html

Four PM Status

Unit 1
At 8:32 am, Mar 29th, transfer from the fire fighting pump to a temporary motor driven pump was made.
Unit 3
-At approximately 2:17pm March 29th, the injection of fresh water by the concrete pump truck was started. (Sea water had been injected so far and transfer from seawater to freshwater was made)
Unit 4
-At approximately 11:50 am on March 29th, lights in the main control room were restored.

* On March 21st, 23rd to 28th, we detected technetium, cobalt, iodine, cesium, tellurium, barium, lanthanum and molybdenum from the seawater around discharge canal of Unit 1, 2, 3 and 4.

* On March 20th, 21st, 23rd to 28th, we detected iodine, cesium, tellurium and ruthenium in the air collected at the site of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

* On March 28th, we detected radioactive materials contained in the puddles found in the turbine building of Unit 1 to 4.

* At approximately 3:30 pm, March 27th, we found water pooling in the vertical shaft of the trench outside of the turbine buildings for Units 1 to 3. The radiation dose at the surface of the water amounted 0.4 mSv/h in Unit 1 and over 1,000 mSv/h in Unit 2. We could not confirm the amount of the radiation dose in Unit 3. We will keep observing the condition of the water in the vertical shaft.

* At 12:03 pm, March 29th, when taking off the flange of the pipe to remove the residual heat in the seawater system, 3 workers from other companies received water in the pipe. Mopping up water, we confirmed no radioactive material had adhered to their bodies.

These guys should be fine; it sounds like they got seawater on themselves, which means they got a shower and new clothes immediately.

Note that Unit 2 appears to be the unit leaking radioactive stuff by far the most. Apparently, the data got corrected yesterday.

Plutonium seems to be the big talking head point today, but they are getting some of it wrong.

1. It is not the most dangerous substance on earth. For one thing, you can eat some of it and live, which you can't do with arsenic, anthrax or any amount of garden variety poisons. But you knew that.

2. Unless they know something I don't, the isotopes found were Plutonium 238, 239, and 240. Given that the half life of all of them is in excess of 87 years, there is nothing to say they were a result of a spill from inside the containment vessel of any of the reactors. They could just as well be due to damage of fuel in the spent fuel pool. If the top of the building blew off Unit 4, and the spent fuel pool was bent up as much as it shows in the area photograph, after the crane fell into it, I can just as well believe that some of the fuel rods were broken open, and spread around in the air by the subsequent fire. I believe that at least one of these isotopes is not generally found

Here's a discussion of plutonium as found in the US (prior to this year)
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp143-c6.pdf

Atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, which ended in 1980, is the source of most of the plutonium in the environment worldwide, which released approximately 10,000 kg of plutonium (DOE 2005a). Nuclear reactor accidents (e.g., the Chernobyl reactor in 1986) and other accidents involving non-U.S. nuclear-powered submarines or nuclear weapons have also released plutonium into the environment. The total amount of plutonium released during these accidents is small on a global scale as compared to the amount of plutonium released during atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Plutonium released to the atmosphere reaches the earth's surface through wet and dry deposition to the soil and surface water. Once in these media, plutonium can sorb to soil and sediment particles or bioaccumulate in terrestrial and aquatic food chains.

The single largest accident that released plutonium into the air turns out to be when a satellite burned up following launch in 1964.

In April, 1964, a Transit Navigational Satellite was launched in California with a payload that included a Satellite for a Nuclear Auxiliary Power Generator (SNAP-9A) containing 17 kCi (630 TBq) of 238Pu. The rocket system failed and the satellite reentered the atmosphere in the Southern Hemisphere and burned over the Indian Ocean at an altitude of about 50 km (Harley 1980). The destruction of the SNAP-9A resulted in the largest single release of 238Pu to the atmosphere, primarily in the form of very small oxide particles (Harley 1980).
 
Last edited:
JAIF reports that spread and dosage of radioactive materials have been modelled by SPEEDI.
The text is in Japanese, but there is a map on page two of where the greatest concentration of material should have fallen, given the weather.

http://www.nsc.go.jp/info/110323_top_siryo.pdf

JAIF has the 9 PM NHK news translated:

As reported before, TEPCO is trying to balance keeping the reactor temperatures down by adding a lesser amount of water, until it can track down and fix the leaks.

No. 36
Today’s NHK news regarding status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station as of 21:00 on March 29

Seawater radiation levels down
The Tokyo Electric Power Company says levels of radiation in seawater near the troubled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have dropped at 2 locations.

Seawater 50 meters north of the plant on Monday afternoon was found to contain 27 becquerels of radioactive iodine-131 per cubic centimeter, or 665.8 times higher than the regulated standard. The level at the location was 1,150 times higher than the standard on Sunday. 330 meters south of the plant, the level was 27.9 times higher than the standard on Monday afternoon, down from more than 1,000 times above the standard on Friday and Saturday.

At Iwasawa Beach, 16 kilometers south of the plant, the level was 58.8 times above the standard on Monday morning, up from Sunday's figure of 7.4 times. Jun Misonoo of Japan's Marine Ecology Research Institute says radioactive substances that leaked into seawater from the plant is expected to initially
flow south along the coast and be diluted by seawater. The flow is likely to converge with the Japan Current off the eastern tip of Chiba Prefecture and go out into the Pacific Ocean, where the radiation
concentration would likely be diluted considerably. Misonoo urged careful monitoring of fish and shellfish for traces of radioactive substances such as cesium that come from power plants and remain in the environment for long periods.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 16:55 +0900 (JST)
Leaked radioactive water hampers cooling of plant No major progress is reported in the effort to drain radioactive water filling the basements of turbine buildings near 3 reactors in the damaged Fukushima
nuclear facility. The delay is hampering work to cool down and stabilize the Daiichi nuclear power plant.
At the Number One reactor, workers have been pumping out contaminated water that filled the turbine condenser. Tokyo Electric Power Company says the water level inside the device has dropped, but cannot say exactly by how much. The plant operator plans to drain the basements of the Number 2 and 3 units and transfer the leaked water into the condensers of the reactors.

But the condensers are already full of water, which will first have to be moved to other tanks in the system. TEPCO says work has already begun, but it is hard to forecast when the
drainage will end. Machines and equipment to restore automatic cooling systems for the reactors
are installed inside the turbine buildings. But the delay in draining contaminated water is blocking restoration.

Tokyo Electric Power Company has begun pouring more fresh water into the No.1 reactor at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to cool it down. TEPCO says the surface temperature of the No.1 reactor rose from 212.8 degrees Celsius as of 6 AM on Monday to 329.3 degrees 20 hours later. It blames heat generated by the reactor's nuclear fuel. The reactor is designed to operate up to 302 degrees under normal conditions. The power company raised the volume of water into the reactor from 113 liters a minute to 141 liters at 8 PM on Monday. As a result, it says, the reactor's temperature fell to 323.3 degrees as of 6 AM on Tuesday. TEPCO says it will continue closely monitoring the reactor while fine-tuning water volume. Tuesday, March 29, 2011 16:19 +0900 (JST)

●TEPCO urged to check leaked water in tunnels
The government's nuclear safety agency has ordered Tokyo Electric Power Company to closely monitor radiation and water levels in tunnels outside the turbine buildings for 3 damaged reactors. The water was found leaking from the reactors and is filling tunnels linking the reactor buildings to outside the damaged Fukushima Daiichi power plant. Radioactivity on the surface of water found just outside the turbine building of the Number 2 reactor is particularly high, at over 1,000 millisieverts per hour. The nuclear agency told reporters on Tuesday that as far as it is aware, the tunnels are not flooded, and are not directly connected to the sea. [ETA TEPCO uses the word "puddles" so I don't think we are talking about "floods". Also the TEPCO report says explicitly, the pipe trenches don't go to the sea]As of Monday, the water had reached 10 centimeters from the mouth of the tunnel for the No.1 reactor. It was about a meter from the mouth of tunnel from the No. 2 reactor and 1.5 meters from the No. 3 reactor tunnel. The agency said it has ordered TEPCO to carefully monitor the radiation and water levels.
TEPCO is piling up sandbags and concrete around the mouth of the tunnels to prevent flooding.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:56 +0900 (JST)

[ETA I got the impression that TEPCO is not talking about the mouth of the tunnels, but the lip of the tunnel, which is trench-like] This was clear in the earlier NHK report.

End
 
Last edited:
That's good to hear.

It's also good to see that NHK doesn't seem to be either under or over sensationalizing the situation at Daiichi. Here in the US, the amount of errors of fact and sensationalism are mind boggling.

At the end of the day, we'll see, but so far at Daiichi, no one has died. As industrial accidents go it is no where in the league of say Bhopal, which to date is the world's worst industrial catastrophe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster

The Bhopal disaster was the world's worst industrial catastrophe. It occurred on the night of December 2–3, 1984 at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. A leak of methyl isocyanate gas and other chemicals from the plant resulted in the exposure of hundreds of thousands of people. Estimates vary on the death toll. The official immediate death toll was 2,259 and the government of Madhya Pradesh has confirmed a total of 3,787 deaths related to the gas release.[1] Other government agencies estimate 15,000 deaths.[2] Others estimate that 3,000 died within weeks and that another 8,000 have since died from gas-related diseases.[3][4] A government affidavit in 2006 stated the leak caused 558,125 injuries including 38,478 temporary partial and approximately 3,900 severely and permanently disabling injuries.[5]

No one in the US is attempting to close all the chemical plants, but even a simple fire at a chemical plant generally kills people and contaminates the neighborhood permanently.

http://www.wqad.com/news/wqad-chemical-plant-fire-illinois-epa-101010,0,7736824.story

By the way, there were some spectacular pictures of a fire at an oil refinery and a chemical plant following the earthquake. Have there been any updates on controlling any toxic waste from those disasters in Japan?

Article
http://www.pennenergy.com/index/pet...eum/refining/2011/03/oil-refineries_shut.html

Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtS50l_ENfk

There was also a chemical plant fire following the earthquake.
http://www.megamediaplex.com/videos...:-chemical-plant-fire-overriding-firefighters
 
NEI Update 11:30 AM EDT March 29th

As usual, a good pithy recap of the technical situation.

UPDATE AS OF 11 A.M. EDT, TUESDAY, MARCH 29:
Japan's nuclear regulatory agency says Tokyo Electric Power Co. needs to balance injecting cooling water into the reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and preventing contaminated water from seeping out, the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum reported Tuesday.

On Monday, TEPCO reported radiation levels of more than 100 rem per hour on the surface of puddles in the reactor 2 turbine building and in a trench outside the building. TEPCO is using sandbags to keep the water confined to the trench, a concrete channel that does not connect to the ocean. The trenches at reactors 1 and 3 are also at risk of overflowing and measures are being taken to contain the water.

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency is awaiting the results of new Science Ministry tests for radioactivity beyond 20-kilometers from Fukushima Daiichi and new samples from TEPCO of the plant grounds.

On Monday, TEPCO discovered minute levels of plutonium in the soil at five locations at the site. The plutonium measured is as little as was in the environment in Japan following nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War and poses no health risk to humans.

Apparently they are as annoyed about the US media as I am. They prepared a factsheet. I'm pleased to see that they agree with me that there is plutonium in all 6 reactors and all 7 spent fuel pools, so you certainly can't tell by what's on the ground what reactor it came from or whether it came from a spent fuel pool instead, but in any case, there's not enough to worry about:

No Health Risk from Plutonium at Fukushima Daiichi(Last updated 3/29/11)


• Tokyo Electric Power Co. on March 28 discovered minute levels of plutonium in the soil at five locations at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant site. The plutonium measured is as little as was in the environment in Japan following nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War.

• The plutonium at the site can be monitored and controlled, and the levels are not harmful to human health.

• Plutonium is not a naturally occurring element and is produced as a byproduct of nuclear energy generation.

• Low-enriched uranium fuel is manufactured with no plutonium in it, but plutonium builds up as a result of operation of the reactor. By the time uranium fuel rods are removed from the reactor, each assembly contains about 1 percent plutonium and generates more power from plutonium than from uranium. Nuclear fuel in all reactors and spent fuel pools contains small amounts of plutonium.

• Fukushima Daiichi reactors 1, 2, 3 and 4 contain more than 4,000 nuclear fuel assemblies in both the reactors and the spent fuel storage pools. The vast majority of these assemblies are low enriched uranium fuel. Only 32 are mixed oxide fuel assemblies made of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide. This represents approximately three quarters of 1 percent (0.75 percent) of all the fuel in the reactors. All 32 mixed oxide assemblies are in reactor 3.
 
TEPCO updated its radiation dose readings again:

West Gate 9:00 PM gamma ray readings 114.0 microSieverts per Hour (lower, and this is the number that they have most consistently published.

Daini 9:00 PM 6.2 microSieverts/hour (steady)

West Gate 9:00 PM 83 microSieverts/Hour
Main Building 9:00 PM 1.1 milliSieverts/Hour lower than it was; still a high number.
Main Gate 9:00 PM 169 microSieverts/Hour lower; wind is back in the west south west.

They have been changing the spent fuel pools over to fresh water:

Today's work for cooling the spent fuel pools
-From 2:17pm to 6:18pm, March 29th, water was injected into Unit 3 from a concrete pumping vehicle. Until March 28th, we had been injecting sea water, however, from March 29th, we started injecting fresh water.
-At Unit 2, seawater had been injected from the fire fighting pump, but at 4:30pm, March 29th, we started injecting fresh water from a temporary motor driven pump instead. The water was injected until 6:25pm, March 29th.
There are now only 12 fire trucks at Daiichi (it was 13).
 
IAEA Afternoon Update

I'm going to split this in two parts, because it is long. The technical stuff is what TEPCO and NHK are reporting, and I will put it here.

Since TEPCO is injecting a lower volume of water, some rise in temperature in the reactors should be expected, and indeed, it is being seen, but is fairly modest. The fact that in Unit 1, when the temperature goes up, the pressure goes up, tends to argue that its Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is at least partially intact.

I'm still wondering what happened to the US Navy barges full of fresh water.

IAEA Briefing on Fukushima Nuclear Accident (29 March 2011, 16:30 UTC)
On Tuesday, 29 March 2011, the IAEA provided the following briefing on the current status of nuclear safety in Japan:

1. Current Situation (ETA Technical)
The situation at the Fukushima Daiichi plant remains very serious.

Accumulated contaminated water was found in trenches located close to the turbine buildings of Units 1 to 3. Dose rates at the surface of this water were 0.4 millisieverts/hour for Unit 1 and over 1 000 millisieverts/hour for Unit 2 as of 18:30 UTC on 26 March. The Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan suggests that higher activity in the water discovered in the Unit 2 turbine building is supposed to be caused by the water, which has been in contact with molten fuel rods for a time and directly released into the turbine building via some, as yet unidentified path. An investigation is underway as to how the water accumulated in the trenches. Measurements could not be carried out at Unit 3 because of the presence of debris.

Fresh water has been continuously injected into the Reactor Pressure Vessels (RPVs) of Units 1, 2 and 3. From today at Unit 1, the pumping of fresh water through the feed-water line will no longer be performed by fire trucks but by electrical pumps with a diesel generator. The switch to the use of such pumps has already been made in Units 2 and 3. At Unit 3, the fresh water is being injected through the fire extinguisher line.

At Unit 1, there has been an increase in temperature at the feed-water nozzle of the RPV from 273.8 °C to 299 °C. The temperature at the bottom of the RPV remained stable at 135 °C. Temperatures at Unit 2 appear relatively stable at the same measurement points. At Unit 3, the temperature at the feed-water nozzle of the RPV is about 61.5 °C and 120.9 °C at the bottom of the RPV. The validity of the RPV temperature measurement at the feed water nozzle is still under investigation.

With the increase in temperature at Unit 1, there has been a corresponding increase in Drywell pressure. In the Drywell of Unit 2, the indicated pressure dropped slightly and is just above atmospheric.

It is planned to begin pumping fresh water into the spent fuel pool of Unit 4 today, on 29 March.

Units 5 and 6 remain in cold shutdown.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top