- Joined
- Jul 26, 2003
And Forbes has a reasonable article about Radiation (this is at a basic level, but if you hadn't seen it, you wouldn't have believed how fast and loose some media were misrepresenting the basics:
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/04/06/science-us-sci-radiation-q-amp-a_8393564.html
Worried about a radioactive ocean? A reality check.
and
and
Here's a useful dose chart that shows the comparative doses you receive in various activities, including visting Chernobyl and Fukushima, and what doses have significant health risks. I found it a good visualization aid.
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/04/06/science-us-sci-radiation-q-amp-a_8393564.html
Worried about a radioactive ocean? A reality check.
Q. So how much radiation is too much radiation?
A. Natural background radiation in the environment varies greatly at different places on Earth, depending on altitude, geology and other factors. In theory, any increase in radiation can lead to a higher risk of cancer. In practice, though, population studies find no apparent elevated risk of cancer even at the highest levels of background radiation. And the most respected radiation experts say people can tolerate at least 10,000 millirems (100 millisieverts) in a short period with no discernible harm. On the other hand, much larger doses - like 400,000 millirems or 4,000 millisieverts - will cause radiation sickness and cancer in many people. That would be the rough equivalent of 40,000 chest X-rays.
and
Q. Can the radioactive water leaking from the Japanese nuclear plant eventually reach the U.S. and be hazardous?
A. It's hard to say how that water will move, because it will spread not only on the surface but downward in deep layers of the Pacific Ocean. If it does reach the West Coast, it would probably take at least 18 months to three years, by one estimate. In any case, nobody expects it would pose a radiation hazard upon arrival because of tremendous dilution along the way.
Airborne radioactive particles have already reached the United States, but federal authorities say the measured levels aren't dangerous.
Q. Weren't the workers at the nuclear plant treated for burns after coming into contact with radioactive water? What if someone swam in the ocean off the coast of Japan?
A. The kind of radiation levels the workers experienced cause sunburn-like burns in about a half-hour to an hour. But swimming near the plant is banned, and radiation levels of water dumped in the ocean decline quickly with distance from the complex
and
A. Measurements so far have focused mostly on iodine and cesium, which were responsible for most of the radiation dose to the public at the Chernobyl disaster.
Radiation from iodine-131 dissipates quickly, falling by half every eight days, so that it's virtually gone in 80 days. Its danger is that if inhaled or swallowed, it can concentrate in the thyroid and cause cancer.
Cesium radiation sticks around much longer, taking 30 years to decline by half and 300 years to virtually disappear. Cesium can build up in the body and high levels are thought to be a risk for various other cancers. Still, researchers who studied Chernobyl could not find an increase in cancers that might be linked to cesium
Here's a useful dose chart that shows the comparative doses you receive in various activities, including visting Chernobyl and Fukushima, and what doses have significant health risks. I found it a good visualization aid.
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/
Last edited: