- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
I agree with Panpie. Chan's skating is technically excellent, but it is almost like a gymnastic exercise on ice, where all the emphasis is on the technical and the music becomes merely the background for rhythmic purposes. Chan skates for himself; the only invitation is that you can watch him skate. Chan devotees and technical purists love his skating above all others.
But I prefer Hanyu who combines superb musicality with technical excellence---his intense connection to the music reaches out and invites the audience and the viewer to share the performance with him (I find myself actually 'jumping' with him when he jumps!) . So often the audience is on their feet long before the performance is over.
Thank you for explaining. As someone who likes Chan's skating, I just can't understand these comments about his performances leaving people cold. I suspected it had something to do with how much he engages the audiences when he skates (something he tries to do in his SP), but was curious to know what he was doing or not doing to elicit such a response.
Indeed, I compare Chan to a master artist. His studio is open and you can go watch him work, but he won't be engaging you much except at the beginning and end of your visit. Visitors are there to learn by observation and admire his craftsmanship. But he is not a Bob Ross who will talk to you and invite you to try to do what he is doing.
My opinion is that unless he is skating in an exhibition or a show, his attempts to engage the audience have not been very successful. His SP hasn't been as good except at Nationals, when he's in front of a home crowd that loves him. So audience engagement is actually a distraction and perhaps detriment to his competitive performances.
Also, if Chan's skating is merely technical and therefore "cold", what about quad machine Jin Boyang? Wouldn't his skating leave people "cold" as well?