Just judged Ashley and Bradie myself, using the excel spreadsheet thing and this is what I came up with:
Ashley: 32.84 + 34.20 = 67.04
Bradie: 37.94 + 33.00 = 70.94
For Bradie, the judges were more generous on the StSq, the loop, and the combo spin. I can understand that. I tend to be strict with StSq goe, which the judges usually aren't. The loop landing was sketch, but the mostly +1s probably reflect the difficult exit right out of it into the step sequence. And the combo spin traveled very slightly, but it might have gone unseen by some and could have been minor enough to ignore at any rate. So, I don't think the 73 and change is unreasonable per se.
Bradie deserves mid-8s for her transitions and program composition; everything is woven together very nicely, there are not many superfluous crossover, and many difficult entrances and exits into and between elements.
My problem is that Wagner's composition and interpretation should have been unequivocally in the 8.75-9.00 range, even with the errors. That said, there is no "fix" here, just overexcitement at a clean skate from a hyped individual. None of this will affect the end result, I don't think. I think the winner (probably Bradie) will have a huge margin, then #2 and #3 will be bunched together, and #4 will bomb and be ten points behind.
It also doesn't make sense why there *would* be an anti-Wagner slant. She is still the posterchild of the sport for the general public, and has commercials and fluff pieces out the wazoo. A U.S. woman is *not* going to be on the olympic podium, probably not even in the final flight. The federation knows this.
They might want tennell for the team comp, that's true, but not dinging Ashley doesn't mean that Bradie would fall out of the top three. The only way that dinging Ashley makes sense is if the judges/fed want Mirai or Karen to be on that team and fear that Ashley will prevent that. Based on the scoresheets I've seen tonight, that seems implausible.