I haven't read anything just going to give my thoughts.
Really satisfying event in the end. The top 4 skated very well more so 2nd to 4th who skated close to their maximum.
I'm kind of shocked that Gubanova got on the podium. What could they do to her though she didn't make a major error, no interruptions to the program, I loved the fist pump after the last jump knowing she's on the podium much like Adam's defiant somersault knowing gold was his.
What a champion knowing what she's up against, I said she would have to perfect and she was as close as she'll get.
I thought Gubanova was incredible then Nina came along. How they scored Nina's jumps was a disgrace. The landings were absolutely no worse than Loena's. Then they destroyed her for components.
I thought Kaiser was amazing as well, and 60 for components was an insult.
I thought Loena deserved to win by the smallest of margins, but maybe I got caught up in the hype as well because the reality is most of the jump were underrotated (and no worse than Nastia or Nina).
Loena's opening combo the lutz had a not clear edge and close to being on the q then the 3T definitely on the q. Instead judges are throwing +2 and +3 at it. Gubanova with a perfect opening combo got similar GOE to Loena's terrible combo.
Then her 2A was close to being on the q instead mainly +3 (even Kaori gets only +4 for the best 2A in history, second lutz in the combo had a not clear edge and on the q not called of course +2 and +3 from the judges. This was no better than Gubanova or Nina's that were given a q.
They did hit her with an < for her 3F in the combo I thought it should have just be a q.
This is not Loena's fault, and I have no problem with her winning, but I think Nina could have easily won that if there was no bias.