I am really enjoying revisionism. Like, at least get your mudslinging straight, people.
Valieva was specifically praised as a balanced skater with uber PCSs, unlike Trusova who was a designated 'jumper' with no artistic qualities or any skating skills whatsoever. The outraged calls to give Trusova 1s and 5s in PCSs instead of 9s were just as common as what we hear for Malinin. And, Lord knows, Chen's skating skills were belittled left and right, which makes me ever more pleased that he is now elevated to a status of the Past Great.
Malinin may or may not perform well in Milan, but he sure had a great outing in this year's GP season so far with nice clean skates, using his full arsenal of quads and cooping with whatever ails him and keeps him up at night. I'll take that. I'm thrilled to have seen that free skate in Saskatoon, it was a privilege.
I'd like to recall that with Eteri girls, there was reputational PCS too. Alexandra Trusova hadn't spared endeavours during her Plushenko time. I think that her parents had more or less chosen coaches for her to be taught in Plushenko's academy, and improving her Skating Skills was clearly an objective. I remember Tweets, perhaps of 2021 Skate America and Skate Canada International, the first with Alexandra Trusova getting an accurate Level 3 and good Grade of Execution for her Step Sequence while Kamila Valieva was getting a Level 4 and high Grade of Execution for her Level 1 Step Sequence... While Anna Shcherbakova started in the best times of the team and always had programs highlighting her qualities (everything except jump technique and glide?) Specifically in the Olympic season Kamila Valieva was given horrible empty drills as programs (and I'm not speaking of the costumes for a 15-year-old) because you know, it was established that she was a complete skater? Like Nathan Chen she could get 10s in Components with a fall... and empty programs and all.
Speaking of Nathan Chen, his Components varied a lot during his competitive time. His early programs could highlight his musicality with two-foot-flat-edge-easy-steps skating, while later, he tried to deserve better Components and did experiments but never managed to have it all in a skate, to my (little) knowledge; that was for the Challenger and Grand Prix. When would come the high-stakes championships, all this vanished for jumping drills and not always catching up with the music. One of Nathan Chen's superiorities over Ilia Malinin (along with his musicality) was his conscience of his shortcomings, he didn't like Figure Skating but I think understood it better and knew more of it, I'm sure he would watch his and others' skates, at least occasionally. Ilia Malinin seems to have strictly none. He does sit his spins and have a better balance than Nathan Chen, which makes that his Element scores are less inflated (but still a lot), and I think that he also has better stamina, which was a problem for Nathan Chen or he would have skated much better, I'm sure.
Speaking of Tech Box inflation, between his Short and Free programs at Skate Canada, and admitting that what I saw rapidly as qs were really qs (which don't exist...) and not light underrotations (like Nathan Chen before him he's losing his Quadruple jumps — but not his Triple Axel, his Solo ones were fully rotated and I suppose that his +3A in sequence would have been, had he not have to save the 4S before), in jumps alone he must have been overscored by around 30 points between the two programs (about 6 for the Short, 24 for the Free):
SP 4F<
3A
4Lzq + 3T (called)
FS 4Fq
3A
4Lzq
4Lo<
4Lzq + 1Eu + 3Fq
4Tq + 3Tq
4Sq + 3A (rather < than q but let's also call it a q)
With less blind Elements scoring and the Components inflation he would still have "won" with 99 and 205 (or the like) indeed, but then the Components, I can't see any scoring grid allowing to score him even 7 in any of the three categories unless giving projection and natural over 90% of the score and being very generous on them? While "of course" giving this joy to watch that is Kazuki Tomono, with a packed program very very few could skate, his musicality, projection too, and all, small 8s... (Of course Kazuki Tomono deserved 9s in the Short; we may note that his two falls in the Free didn't impact.) Perhaps other skaters would have had the mental strength to do less errors too.
Let's make simulation, depending on how you would score his Components, and doing as judges do, practically the same score for all three categories and two programs whatever a skater's strengths and weaknesses (this is a general remark), starting from these 99 and 205 marks:
- with 8 in Components (where?), his scores would have been 94 and 195, total 289; he would have won this, but be a mere "medallable" for Olympic Games and World Championships because "men are menning" and Ilia Malinin is in a phase of consistency;
- with 7 in Components, his scores would have been 89 and 185, total 274; hardly medallable at important championships;
- with 6 in Components, his scores would have been 84 and 175, total 259;
please don't extract this single line to call me names and distort the meaning of this simulation.
We may also discuss his and others' Components, not the scores, but how he's skating in comparison with his competitors; I don't know if a comparison with Kazuki Tomono or Kévin Aymoz (to take Skate Canada competitors) would be that fair, they're in another league? But with skaters with good Skating Skills, Presentation and a good Composition (with all what they entail now)?