- Joined
- Oct 9, 2011
Because it wasn't intentional, probably they didn't deduct it as being against the rules? I don't recall what they did with Yura Min from the South Korean ice dance team, who had a similar problem in the Team Event? But on the other hand, the costumes should be secure designed to stay on through all movements. I would think they would have had numerous costume run throughs to avoid this very thing? I just don't get why the other teams under the top 3 had "violation of choreography" and something to do with "violation of costume and props"?Except the rules do warrant a deduction.
This is from 2016 rules (if anyone can find a more up-to-date link, please feel free to correct me), found on this ISU.org page.
Rule 50
Clothing
1. At ISU Championships, the Olympic Winter Games and International Competitions, the clothing of the Competitors must be modest, dignified and appropriate for athletic competition – not garish or theatrical in design. Clothing may, however, reflect the character of the music chosen. The clothing must not give the effect of excessive nudity inappropriate for the discipline.
Now, I am very liberal in my views & honestly don't care if nipples are shown on tv. But I do question if the nip slip warranted a deduction by this ISU rule. If it's against their rules, it deserves the deduction, same as if you had a piece of your costume fall onto the ice.
Edited to add: I just looked it up. Yura Min did not get a deduction, so they were consistent with Gabby's situation.

I think it's appropriate they didn't get a costume deduction, nothing fell on the ice. I'm a bit worried that social media might have a field day over the incident and not show Gabby any respect. Hope I'm wrong though!
)