- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
You make an interesting point. Eveything matters in figure skating. But im pretty sure the"hard stuff" is the most important aspect of seperating figure skating when deciding gold silver and bronze.
And that hard stuff has an entirely separate section in the scoring called TES, where individual elements are given a value and a Grade of Execution is judged (or GoE) based on nothing but how they were performed. PCS is not that, though the elements make up a program. You can do great elements, and still have a bad or displeasing or junorish program. She performs the individual elements very well, though the combo not so much today. However, Zagitova's program is not worthy of the PCS it is given, in comparison to the other, more mature, better skating, better artists in the field with better programs that perform their elements just as well (or better, in Caro's case) than her. Period.
Do you understand what makes up PCS? Or should I explain that to you as well?
The problem is that with the quantification of Skating, they've tried to quantify taste and artistry, and that just doesn't work. Artistry and art is more than the sum of its parts, and you know it when you see it. Eteri's style of putting together programs is NOT art. It's movement for the sake of gathering points and nothing else.