but giving 9,75 is too much with a pop and not so amazing skating overall, right? He was overscored, but hanyu could be never overscored because he has to have at least 9,25 while stepping on ice
Pops literally
do not matter for PCS (or do you have any official documents proving otherwise?), so you
cannot argue about which PCS scores were too high or too low using them. "Not so amazing skating" is
your personal opinion (and I don't think your opinion on Hanyu is particularly neutral), others will say his skating was flawless in all of the ways that matter for PCS (Reminder: PCS
≠ TES, as per the ISU rules they are supposed to be kept
separate unless a technical fault severely impacts the program like a fall does for example).
Come on now. A pop is a serious error. We aren’t talking about tripling a quad - he popped it to a single.
A pop absolutely affects the integrity of a performance. There was an audible gasp when he popped the jump, and while everything else was done well, it was an unambiguously critical error. The overall impact of this skate was fundamentally different from if he had skated it cleanly.
If he popped all three jumping passes and went on with his program as if nothing happened should he still be allowed to get 10.00?
A program with a singled quad absolutely should not get 9.75 for PE or IN, which some judges still incorrectly gave him.
The rules even clarify that the rules must apply to all levels of skaters from extremely poor to outstanding — as if to almost acknowledge that some judges will ignore this when it comes to top-tier skaters.
Nowhere in the whole rule does it mention impact on the audience as a criterion for a serious error (or PCS for that matter) - I guess with that thinking, Sasha Trusova should receive all 10s for a clean 5 quad-Free Skate, after all the impact that will have will be huge. Nor does it mention integrity of the
performance, it mentions integrity of the
composition. This is a very deliberate usage of the word. Composition,
as per the ISU, is "An intentionally developed and/or original arrangement of all types of movements according to the principles of musical phrase, space, pattern, and structure." - Let me ask again, was this impacted?
As for your question - Yes, theoretically even programs with no valid jump element or only singles and doubles should be able to receive 10s. Why? Because TES and PCS were deliberately separated. The goal was to be able to independently judge them, including every single PCS component. Theoretically, it should also be possible for a skater to receive a 9.00 in performance and a 4.50 in transitions. (In fact, there are many (retired) skaters out there, who can't jump anything more than a double jump (anymore), but whose skating skills and performative abilities still far surpass the majority of skaters currently competing.) It might not fit your worldview, but this is how the judging system was designed (even if it is not how it is employed, due to human bias - technically challenging skates are very impressive, which can overshadow artistic or choreographic flaws).
The reason they deliberately mention that this applies to all levels of skaters is actually the exact
opposite of your thought process. The limitations explicitly mentioned are the limitations for a skater who usually scores 10.00. So the limitations for a skater usually scoring 9.00 should be 8.75 and 8.50 with one serious error, 8.25 and 7.75 with multiple. For a skater usually scoring 8.00, they should be 7.75 and 7.50 with one serious error, 7.25 and 6.75 with multiple. And so on. As these scores aren't explicitly mentioned, you will often see judges
not adhering to these rules (For example Anna S. - With a clean SP, she received 36.34 PCS (Average: 9.085 per PCS category) at IdF. At Euros, she received 36.26 PCS with a fall (a definite serious error). Obviously, this isn't even remotely Anna's fault, but shows how judges disregard the rules - Her maximum PCS score should have been around 34.60, 1.66 points below the score she received.)