- Joined
- Dec 7, 2012
^Thank you for the translation, WhiteBamboo. I tried to make sense of it but I could only read one word in five of the captions.
Maybe this is a weird place to discuss this, but I noticed your graph of his programs on your blog. It was interesting to see how you plotted his programs--I understood most of what you were going for, but at the same time I know I would've marked a few programs differently. Probably goes to show how subjective programs are, even when reduced to just two parametres.
Oh, thank you! I have to say that was probably one of those times when I kind of went off the deep end. :
I very much agree that how one interprets his programs can be very subjective indeed. Partly, I think it's because there's so many different things, different aspects to them...And it always seemed to me that in his programs, he often does not try to directly "tell a story" in any obvious way, but tends more towards the "evocative". I don't quite know how to express this, but maybe to me, it's as if he pulls the audience to "meet" him emotionally somewhere along the way...(Sorry, I suppose that does not make too much sense; it's hard to describe.)