I don't think I read this exact article linked from this thread before or maybe I missed it. Lots of good stuff for a mind buff like me.
Canada's Patrick Chan focusing on mental game
Maybe I shouldn't be surprised, though I am, that Patrick had no idea how his best performances came about. Most people try to figure it out by examining the situation, the circumstances, the activities leading up to the event including the training, the food consumed, the lucky happenings, etc. Few would think of their mental and emotional state at the time and just before. If they could recreate that state of mind, they would most likely recreate the result. And that state is usually relaxed focus, a positive mood and a total belief in the positive outcome. I hope Patrick has learned the skill to get into it, which is the Zone. Getting into the flow and he will flow flawlessly on ice.
It's right for him not to set a goal he does not fully believe in. He can set up a goal achievable in his mind, like clean performances, instead of thinking about winning and the pressure that comes with it. However, though it's best to leave any resistance triggering thoughts alone, it's not necessary to explicitly exclude the possibility of a very desirable outcome or replacing it with a lower goal. That's why it bothered me that he just wanted to be in the pack. As he wished, he stayed with the pack with mediocre results. If he does not have the conviction of his winning chances, it's then best to not think about it at all but to focus on his goal of clean performances with successful attempts of his jumps. IOW, focusing on the process as oft advocated by
4verchan. However, a conviction of his ability and of winning is even better, if it's a real conviction, not a desperate optimism.
It was very interesting that Takahashi, who had said he wanted both a beautiful performance and winning, could not answer when asked to choose one. A good performance would likely lead to a win but the two goals/results are not equivalent. But one doesn't have to choose. Pick both, or one without rejecting the other.
I'm also glad Patrick is smart to value his health even for after his skating career.
Gosh... i would a lot to say about your comments VB.
Figure skating has a lot in common with performing arts. For instance, once a mistake is made, it is hard to refocus... sometimes Patrick gets back in there.. sometimes he doesn't... same with artists.
So the main target of psychotherapy is to aim at building tools to prepare for The Zone, and to get back in it when one goes out of it.
Here is something... I don't always access the zone... I have been working on this much longer than Patrick (i am older) and I am still not sure what conditions make me access it..... My last concert... very recently. First half of the show : perfectly in communion with music and soul... super Zone achieved... What did I do before? Nothing much. Just focused... Breathing ... embracing the moment living each note. ( a figure skater would live one step, one element at the time or could also relate to the music, one note at the time and its choreography). Intermission came... after it, zone was not there... Performance was affected. it took me 2-3 minutes before getting back in it for the rest of the show... it was flickering for that long... No idea what happened... was it a fluke? However, with what I have learned : avoid self-pressure and judgment, I managed to get back in it after those couple minutes. It flickered out briefly a couple more times but nothing to affect the performance.
After the show, I was upset about it because it hasn't happened in so long. At the same time, if it were an important event for me, it was not as final as a championship may be.
The thing though is that The Zone remains a mystery state. It's not an easy on/off button. So I am
not surprised that Patrick says he is not sure what makes him perform best or not. There are many factors. For instance, I think that what happened to me recently is that I fell in love with the piano at the beginning of the concert. At the intermission, I thought, it's so nice to have such a nice piano to play (it's not always the case on tour... trust me!!!) and then, knowing the conditions were so nice, probably disturbed my approach : in the first half, I was discovering each note, each colour, without knowing if the piano had limits or where they were, it made me aware of every detail of the performance, as if things were happening in slow motion, my brain controlling everything perfectly well... in the second half, expectations were there. And that's when it got difficult

But this is not easy to assess or analyze. It takes a long time.
What surprises me is that Patrick didn't do this kind of work early on in his career.... especially after Sochi or even in preparation for it.
Young kids who are successful very young tend to create this alternative zone feeling... perhaps Patrick felt like that before Sochi and didn't feel he needed help. Nathan definitely knows how to get there... However, it is very rare that the alternative zone feeling lasts forever. Things get more and more difficult with age and expectations.
It's the second time I use expectations : because it's really the enemy of the zone

you have to be in symbiosis with the performance and not judge... expectations make you evaluate your performance which then makes you behind in time... the brain needs to always be there and ahead... not behind in time...
For instance, some performers have told that when they play contemporary (and highly dissonant music) they feel more confident because practically nobody in the audience can hear their mistakes.... this is related also to expectations : audience is not expected to notice mistakes... then performer doubts less and performs with more ease..
Doubt : cannot go there. When there is doubt, there cannot be any zone... that's why the process is more important than the result. The process makes you work and aim for greatness but doesn't specify when or where it will happen.... or even how... as long as you work well, good things will happen... and that's all. The results, like winning, will create expectations, and perhaps doubt. For Patrick, how can he say, i am going to win and be 100% certain of that with a lower base value??? Not happening. And if he did, his brain would reject this, create doubt and bad performances would come in....
What Patrick seems to have done at 4CC is believe that he could win while clean... that's also dangerous because you are imposing conditions on your performance. If that condition is not met, even if it's a slight turn out on a combo, the rest of the performance may be altered.
If I were Patrick Chan, I would know how to answer that question Daisuke couldn't answer...
Patrick wants to skate well.... that's all... the rest is up to the others. He can only control what he does and not what the others do. Would he be happy if he made mistakes but everyone else made more? Ask Yuzuru if he is happy about his performance at Sochi.... he is surely happy he won... but not about his skating...
I want Patrick to experience pride that comes from the humblest place. Knowing that you work hard and well, and perform to your abilities, without any other agenda than just skating for the love of it, to share his artistry with the world.. from there can come the best performances, and the right kind of pride, the one based on genuine, humble, soulful dedication.
As I said, too many things in my head about this topic and not much time to edit this... so maybe I will need to clarify this but yeah.... it's not surprising to me that Patrick is still looking and searching... It's a very long process.... and he is very young. It takes a life time sometimes to get there on a regular basis... the good news though, is that if he does believe in the process he is going through, it will get easier and easier to access the mental state needed to perform to his ability.
The main difference between a pianist for instance, and a skater... I am not including tricks that i can only land 80% of the time.... let alone 95% of the time... At my level, everything on the page is mastered. There is NO DOUBT ever.
Skaters, even the top ones, have risky elements. Those risky elements will create doubt. Performing with doubt and reaching the zone is almost incompatible. That is why we see performances unravel after a fall or a jump landed against all odds.... that is why some skaters have the reputation of "if she/he lands the first jump, it will go very well for them (i .e Josée Chouinard) .... If we look at Patrick, it's not so much the first success that will build confidence... it's mostly the first mistake that makes him doubt afterwards.... Sochi was the perfect example for that... After two fabulous quads, a mistake came in, and then he doubled jumps.... so one misstep and he no longer trusted.
okok i quit for now... as I said, i am fascinated by the parallel with performing artists and figure skaters and i could talk a lot about this..
All i hope for Patrick is that he finds his inner peace.