- Joined
- May 15, 2024
ok, what happened? did they made backflip mandatory or let Russians compete this season?LOL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ok, what happened? did they made backflip mandatory or let Russians compete this season?LOL.
ok, what happened? did they made backflip mandatory or let Russians compete this season?
just curious why you wrote LOL, I'm not watching liveI have no idea what you're talking about.
just curious why you wrote LOL, I'm not watching live
The problem with this is that I don't know who you saw and when, because I have a feeling that if your introduction to skating had been for example Sasha Trusova, and not Toller, your perception of the artistic merits of skating would be quite different, perhaps even to the point of not watching it again.
Don't want to step on your toes, but can you please just try to explain what about for example this routine is disconnected from the music? I'm genuinely asking.

LOL.
Given that the delegates were confused by the process and the changes to the programs that they were voting on, it's better to make sure everyone understands the process. I'm glad her proposal to have a secret vote was passed so that all the delegates can be certain about the votes given the technology issues they're having.Thankfully there was a gentleman on the panel who explained to the woman from Ireland that you don't need to have the same number of votes as the number of people in the room. You can't force someone to vote.
She's 20, but besides the point. There is so much stylised movement (also to the genre of the song) in this routine that it's very difficult to miss, in my opinion.The song is about a guy who had good sex and wants more good sex (sorry, this isn't deep and complicated song) and the girl who is btw 18 does a ribbon routine. The routine is impressive, but I'm not sure if I want to know where is the connection with the song.
Given that the delegates were confused by the process and the changes to the programs that they were voting on, it's better to make sure everyone understands the process. I'm glad her proposal to have a secret vote was passed so that all the delegates can be certain about the votes given the technology issues they're having.
Because they're not voting on passing proposals, they're voting to remove proposals from a package. The package as a whole will pass. If they don't remove the proposal, then it passes. So now 239 and 240 are kept in the package and they will pass with the package.It's my understanding they are not casting a second vote on 239 and 240. The secret vote is for 241 and who knows what they'll do to 245 after 241. They have been using the green and red cards all day today as well as yesterday, but suddenly they are confused? I'm not buying it.
I am sure this will make a looooot of difference.Proposal 221 ( technical committee evaluating national bias) - accepted
Proposal 222 (letters of warning for national bias) - also accepted
It reminds me of that old Yes Minister episode about quangos and paid junkets. But I like step sequences, they just need to make doing them well (like spirals etc) worth as much as jumps.And why has no one proposed that the judges who are caught cheating are banned for life? Or a proposal that cuts back on the awkwardness and ugliness of the step sequence?
Sometimes I think this session /committee / whatever is a massive waste of time and money.
No wonder this sport is in trouble. Instagram? You want to create policy in a sport based on Instagram views? Get real.
Because they're not voting on passing proposals, they're voting to remove proposals from a package. The package as a whole will pass. If they don't remove the proposal, then it passes. So now 239 and 240 are kept in the package and they will pass with the package.
The delegates came to the session thinking that there would be more discussion and then realized there wouldn't be.
Now they're on edge even more and wanting to make sure everything is counted correctly. If a secret ballot can help them feel assured by the process, then that's the right thing to do. The ISU needs to have the trust of the delegates when voting.
241 hasn't been removed yet, to my understanding, they will vote on it tomorrow, I think?So, the motion to remove the proposal that reduced the number of jumps failed by 1 vote. As such, the proposal moves forward as a package and will most likely be passed. The proposal that was removed, 241, focuses on the choreo spin and whether skaters can repeat the same type of jump three times. Before everyone panics, the removal of one jumping pass would mean that Ilia could still do one of every type of quad. Most men will remove a triple flip or lutz, and the women can do a full-triple program and avoid doing a solo double axel or triple sal. This will put more value on each individual jumping pass, so skaters will want to skate cleaner and do more difficult programs with the jumps they do have. Of course, I tend to be a bit of an optimist, and I know lots of people will have strong feelings on this, but I think none of us can fully pass judgement until we've seen it in action.