- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
The audience is dead silent. Did Farris even get any clapping from poeple in the arena? None..
The same Goe and pcs games like with Chan.
Ah... a new "points"- balletic contrast to classic male presentation. Yeah, that is what guys should do to win. Step-outs, falls- doesn't matter. Just give a ballerina stuff and you are in.It's a good balletic contrast to Maxim's performance.
No way. Some local sofa specialists told me that taking BV as a proof is for unknowledgable people only. I am having fun to see how things got turned 180 when another guy is "on the table."...but not really.
Protocols are up. Farris' BV was almost 2 points higher than Kovtun.
That's where the difference is.
Ah... a new "points"- balletic contrast to classic male presentation. Yeah, that is what guys should do to win. Step-outs, falls- doesn't matter. Just give a ballerina stuff and you are in.
Did you read what you just said? A classic male presentation is stuff with posing and no transition. Broken record. Yawn.Ballet is much harder to do on ice than classic male presentation, which is a lot about posing and a lack of transitional elements,
Did you read what you just said? A classic male presentation is stuff with posing and no transition. Broken record. Yawn.
Oh, please, anyway can say "I am right", "I am the one who knows facts", etc. Come up with something constructive. And "pretty much the same" is not the same as "the same." That a point difference can make poeple won Olympics (Vancouver). Hey, your original argument was about better balletic presentation over classic male ones with posing and no transitions. Now you switched into talking about levels and conspiracy in Tech squad. Nice.I don't mind being a broken record if I'm right. Not my problem if you don't like facts. Both Farris and Kovtun received pretty much the same PCS scores anyway, about a point difference. The main difference came in the level calls, but I would be suspect given that the technical caller was likely American (Susan Lynch?).
Oh, please, anyway can say "I am right", "I am the one who knows facts", etc. Come up with something constructive. And "pretty much the same" is not the same as "the same." That a point difference can make poeple won Olympics (Vancouver). Hey, your original argument was about better balletic presentation over classic male ones with posing and no transitions. Now you switched into talking about levels and conspiracy in Tech squad. Nice.
You are not consistent with your claims. Now you call protocols "evidence" but before and ironically later in this very post I am quoting you claimed that protocols are incorrect. Which leads to the only logical conclusion possible- you are biased and are using protocols as "evidence" only when you find them convinient to back up your claims, and not when you do not. Lame, dear. Peope disagree with scores and judging all the time on forums, so leave you "protocols-evidence" argument somewhere there if you want to be taken seriously. The guy without clean 3A, which is the toughest element in junior SP, should not be in the lead if there is another guy who did the jump, as well as was quite close in other stuff, if Farris didn't get gift-levels from Tech squad. I didn't say Kovtun should be in the lead with 10 points. I said he should be with a small gap.I use evidence from what is shown in the protocols.
I think the score difference between Hino and Brown is more discussion worthy than that of Kovtun and Farris. Jason did a messy 2f and Hino had a clean skate. Josh's 3a step out garnered about the same -GOE as Kovtun's 3lip with a turnout - that is fair, and so the remaining difference came down to levels, PCS margin is hardly relevant. Hino was the only guy that skated clean and he's in 4th...if anyone wuzrobbed its him. Brown is a good skater but I don't agree with his PCS marks being comparable to Kovtun and Farris, who are pretty clearly the class of this field IMO.