We got to page 601 on April 12th (I looked it up), and we got to page 701 on September 18th. That’s 100 pages in about 4 months. At that rate we’ll be over 1,000 by next September (12 months).

I hope Patrick’s costumes have plenty of color on the shirt. My wishes are red/orange/dusty brown for the SP, and dark blue (not too close to black) for the LP.
I

your definition of emoting as when
simple things are done in a way that can be received powerfully by the audience. And then you mentioned the Exilados Patrick did at 17. I loved it then and I love it now. So now I’m wondering, do you see a difference in Patrick’s delivery of Esqualo six years later? Granted, they are different pieces, but both are tangos. I don’t necessarily watch Patrick’s face when he’s skating because I’m watching his entire body while he skates. In what ways has his musical expression evolved in those six years? He's never been hugely into facial expressions during competitions. And, a related question, can the live audience notice the facial expressions? It seems to me that facial expressions are picked up only by TV cameras. The live audience, OTOH, would notice instead the full body movement that Patrick has become so adept at. Right? It is fascinating to have two tangos from Patrick to compare, skated six years apart. The movements in Esqualo seem sharper, but like you said, he did hit every note in Exilados. Esqualo seems “deeper” and more expressive somehow, but I can’t explain why. A tale of two tangos. Both programs have a very special place in my heart! :yes:
Technique as a means to acquire artistry!!!

I’m learning, mostly by hanging out on GS, that contrary to popular belief, artistry and technical expertise are NOT mutually exclusive categories. Rather good technique frees you up to be more artistically expressive. So, all artists have good technique as their foundation. Therefore, the “technical skater” vs “artistic skater” is a bit of a false dichotomy. Unfortunately, usually “technical” is used as shorthand for “good at executing quality jumps regularly, especially quads, 3As, and 3-3s.” In that narrow sense, the dichotomy does exist and there is a big divide between various skaters. So it can be hard for people, myself included, to realize how “technical” good-quality step sequences, good-quality spins, and good-quality transitions actually are. That’s why step sequences and spins are part of TES. Patrick once said something like, “Skating is what leads you to your jump.” Skating skills aren’t simply there as part of artistry; they’re there because they lead to everything worthwhile in the program. Patrick uses his solid technique on the ice to show us the musical nuances. His musical sensitivity, plus his technique on the ice, plus his maturity of expression gained through experience makes for a truly lovely combination!!!

Okay, I’ll get off my soap box now.
two nice paragraphs i will try to reply to
1) tango de los exilados vs esqualo
Yes, both pieces are very different musically but also they are in their respective context : one is a program that I feel was created to challenge young Patrick in using his skills to the maximum, the other is a show program.... so I am not sure we can really compare the evolution so much, it would have been possible with an esqualo as a competitive program perhaps... To me, the comparison though comes from looking even at just last year and this year's programs.... Patrick seems to have gone another gear in skating à la Patrick Chan

The approach is modern, free, and in complete symbiosis with music. Nothing is superfluous.... simplicity.... Patrick was described as the perfect skater for the IJS COP... however, in these recent years, we haven't seen him backload or tano his way up.. or simply adding awkward transitions into jumps... he skates... and he skates with another ideal... it's not about the 10% bonus or the GOE... it's about sublime purity... and that is to me, his response to what figure skating is and should be. Beautiful, smooth and pure skating.
2) you are correct : it's hard to see facial expressions from the audience when live... but of course, perhaps the judges have a better view... but there is, in big events, a large screen that is shown... so you get to see the skater live.. and you get the facial expression... you also get crossed-eyes for trying to look at both at the same time LOL.
However, when I went to see Patrick, I tried to focus only on him, not the big screen... because of course, the big screen is what one gets at home.
I loved seeing him on the ice because he just glides in all directions... that you cannot see on tv much as the cameras just follow him...
regarding artistry and technique... i can tell you from a musician point of view.. but i feel it's the same thing with every skill based sport ...
some people are more musical or artistic than others naturally... so with kids.. often we will say... Oh!! so musically talented... etc.. and some others get the dexterity and velocity quite easily and we will say " this kid has great technique or technical potential"..
and I am sure it is the same with young athletes... some skaters nail jumps easier than others at a young age... etc...
but my point is the following : at an elite level, without proper technique, there won't be art... even for the ones musically gifted... simply because to get to an excellent artistic performance, everything needs to be mastered, especially big tricks

you cannot play schumann or brahms... without the proper preparation... then... some musicians will be able to transcend the "elements" and bring the public with them on a musical and artistic journey...
i feel it's similar in figure skating... some athletes may be good enough to land iffy jumps but with a guy like Patrick, there is no break from when he skates, spins or jumps... it's all within his technical grasp... his edges.. his blade work... and that's why, even if perhaps he may not be at ease with all the quads like some of the other skaters, his jumps are till beautiful as they come from that technical mastery.
For instance, a singer may have high notes but her connection (passagio) to lower notes is rough... and when she sings, you hear how uneven her performance is.
Patrick is often overlooked when it comes to spins... why? because he doesn't do the crazy positions.... but his spins are the most elegant, centered, rotated with good and even speed spins we can see out there... and they come right from the program, without bumps.. they are integrated smoothly....
younger skaters who are still developing will often "telegraph" a spin... as they need to set it up... then they stop... and go back to skating at the end of it...
so all these examples to me, show how an artistic performance needs to be flawlessly flowing from beginning to end, without any interruption in its continuity... in its emotional charge... and that's where I feel Patrick shines brightly... since he masters his sport in all its aspects, he is able to build an experience that will connect from the beginning till the end...
so without, technique, there are interruptions and thus, art is compromised... that would be a very simple way to summarize it...
without technique, there is a lack of precision in edges/posture/ control etc.. and again, art is compromised...
without technique, there are no means to achieve true artistic goals...
for instance and back to a musician perspective : when I work on a piece of music, I imagine how I want it to sound... well.. if I hear it very fast in my head and my fingers aren't able to follow, then technique isn't mastered enough to provide the artistic vision I have...
that's why choreographers talk about Patrick like the dream skater to create for... as they know that he can do it all... so their vision can be recreated on the ice without worries about the difficulty of the choreography...
