Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, I remembered Alexei Yagudin said that he loved to skate in Canada the most. So he chose to have his Farewell Skate and Speech at 2003 Skate Canada.![]()
Murakami's skating looks good on the surface, but looks can be deceiving. She has an ugly flutz and a UR problem: in the SP, she got a UR and a downgrade, and 3 URs in the FS. She gets good PCS scores, but that can't make up for the deficient TES.
You forgot the main point- David Dore. That answers well to the question about international judges.a) It's the biggest skating federation in the world (according to it's own website).
b) The key designer of COP was Canadian, though the idea was kicking around after the wierdness of Euros 1997.
c) Skate Canada tends to be present at a lot of events to boost their skaters with the judges (this has been noted by both those "on the other side" and those who's bias is perhaps less vehement)
d) The new powerhouses with money (the Japanese, Chinese and Korean federations) are still NEW in the grand scheme of things.
I find all of this discussion disheartening to say the least. Goldenskate used to be a forum where the merits of the skating were discussed politely and, at times, different posters agreed to disagree. During the last few years this has changed and there is now blatant dislike of skaters with rude and snide comments regarding their appearance, nationality etc.
Would I have had the results a little different? Yes, but I am not about to declare a conspiracy against Suzuki. Especially given that the panel was an international panel.
The treatment of Patrick Chan has also been disgusting at times on this forum. The sarcastic remarks etc. do nothing to help us have proper discussions about our sport.
I find all of this discussion disheartening to say the least. Goldenskate used to be a forum where the merits of the skating were discussed politely and, at times, different posters agreed to disagree. During the last few years this has changed and there is now blatant dislike of skaters with rude and snide comments regarding their appearance, nationality etc.
Would I have had the results a little different? Yes, but I am not about to declare a conspiracy against Suzuki. Especially given that the panel was an international panel.
The treatment of Patrick Chan has also been disgusting at times on this forum. The sarcastic remarks etc. do nothing to help us have proper discussions about our sport.
THIS!!! Thank you, jan!
I quite agree. This thread is really ridiculous.
BTW - Here are the officials:
http://www.isuresults.com/results/gpcan2012/SEG004OF.HTM
It is an international panel. There was one Canadian judge.
In all honesty, I don't have that big of a problem with Kaetlyn winning because she did have a lead from the SP, and although Akiko won the LP doing 5 clean triples and Kaetlyn doing 4 triples, Kaetlyn did have an extra double which lessens the TES gap between them. It was close.I agree that Suzuki should have won the competition. Kaetlyn gave two good performances, but she doesn't have Suzuki's speed and personality on the ice. Kaetlyn's PCS scores in the FS were hugely inflated and Akiko's were held down. That's how the win was eked out for Kaetlyn.
I don't recall the booing, but I was at Skate Canada last year and what you say in the bold is true. Maybe not for every single audience member, but this was my impression at the time. Now there is this one sweet lady who has a Canadian sweater who brought multiple flags to cheer for skaters from other countries. Canadian flag, American flag, Japanese flag, etc. to suit her needs. But, as far as general noise-level goes, I agree with you.I believe the judges are overly influenced by the reaction of the crowd. Canadian audiences invariably give riotous standing ovations for all the Canadian competitors while giving the non-Canadians polite applause. Did anyone else notice that when Ralph/Hill were placed last in the SD, the audience booed the marks?
I find all of this discussion disheartening to say the least. Goldenskate used to be a forum where the merits of the skating were discussed politely and, at times, different posters agreed to disagree. During the last few years this has changed and there is now blatant dislike of skaters with rude and snide comments regarding their appearance, nationality etc.
Would I have had the results a little different? Yes, but I am not about to declare a conspiracy against Suzuki. Especially given that the panel was an international panel.
The treatment of Patrick Chan has also been disgusting at times on this forum. The sarcastic remarks etc. do nothing to help us have proper discussions about our sport.
In all honesty, I don't have that big of a problem with Kaetlyn winning because she did have a lead from the SP, and although Akiko won the LP doing 5 clean triples and Kaetlyn doing 4 triples, Kaetlyn did have an extra double which lessens the TES gap between them. It was close.
PCS: Kaetlyn has a delightful personality and seems to be a very warm, natural performer. I suspect she must have some dance background. I don't object to her getting a higher Performance mark than Akiko. On the other hand, Akiko's Skating Skills, Choreography and Interpretation should really have been higher. 8's and especially 9's for Kaetlyn in the PCS sections are blatantly :scratch:
I don't recall the booing, but I was at Skate Canada last year and what you say in the bold is true. Maybe not for every single audience member, but this was my impression at the time. Now there is this one sweet lady who has a Canadian sweater who brought multiple flags to cheer for skaters from other countries. Canadian flag, American flag, Japanese flag, etc. to suit her needs. But, as far as general noise-level goes, I agree with you.
What are some other factors that may have swayed some judges?
- as others mentioned, maybe it was trying to overcompensate for guilt from the SP under-estimation of Osmond.
- maybe they are trying to win small favours for the 2013 Worlds-to-be?
I don't have a huge problem with Kaetlyn being given the win here, because I don't quite "get" Akiko enough to rave about her. But come on, where in Kaetlyn's LP did she deserve 9's in any PCS? :disapp: I can't help but be suspicious about that.
Thank you for this! My friends and I have always felt great fondness for Katia and Yags. And Scotty was pretty much an honourary Canadian! At SC, Fernandez got a standing O, according to what I saw on tv.
i find all of this discussion disheartening to say the least. Goldenskate used to be a forum where the merits of the skating were discussed politely and, at times, different posters agreed to disagree. During the last few years this has changed and there is now blatant dislike of skaters with rude and snide comments regarding their appearance, nationality etc.
Would i have had the results a little different? Yes, but i am not about to declare a conspiracy against suzuki. Especially given that the panel was an international panel.
The treatment of patrick chan has also been disgusting at times on this forum. The sarcastic remarks etc. Do nothing to help us have proper discussions about our sport.
I find all of this discussion disheartening to say the least. Goldenskate used to be a forum where the merits of the skating were discussed politely and, at times, different posters agreed to disagree. During the last few years this has changed and there is now blatant dislike of skaters with rude and snide comments regarding their appearance, nationality etc.
Would I have had the results a little different? Yes, but I am not about to declare a conspiracy against Suzuki. Especially given that the panel was an international panel.
The treatment of Patrick Chan has also been disgusting at times on this forum. The sarcastic remarks etc. do nothing to help us have proper discussions about our sport.
yessssss!